-
618 F. Supp. 2d 1372·
S.D. Fla.·
2008-12-30
·cited 1×
The court held that while defendants engaged in conduct impeding IRS administration, their efforts to correct past behavior and implement new procedures warranted keeping them in business with an injunction against offending conduct.
-
558 F. Supp. 2d 1243·
S.D. Fla.·
2008-03-31
·cited 1×
The court granted the motion to dismiss in part, allowing the quiet title claim to proceed if service is perfected, but dismissing claims under 26 U.S.C. § 7433 and the Declaratory Judgment Act.
-
922 So. 2d 1104·
Fla. 4th DCA·
2006-03-22
·cited 1×
Thomas Mortimer sought habeas corpus relief challenging Florida's sexual offender registration and reporting statutes on single-subject constitutional grounds. The Fourth District Court of Appeal dismissed the petition, holding that habeas corpus is not the appropriate remedy for
-
992 F.2d 430·
2d Cir.·
1993-04-28
·cited 1×
A status quo injunction pending arbitration, when based on a contract's status quo provision, must be analyzed under specific performance principles, not preliminary injunction standards.
-
196 So. 2d 486·
Fla. 3d DCA·
1967-03-14
·cited 1×
The court held that a surety is a proper party in a mechanic's lien foreclosure action where a bond has been substituted for the lien, and that the defense of duress by business compulsion was properly stricken because the defendants had an adequate remedy at law.
-
S.D. Fla.·
1926-07-13
·cited 1×
District court denied defendant's motion to dismiss a bill for rescission of a land sale contract, holding that equity jurisdiction is proper because damages at law are inadequate when the seller fails to perform concurrent covenants for improvements.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-08-08
The court recommended granting default judgment against the defendant for copyright infringement, awarding statutory damages, attorneys' fees, costs, and injunctive relief.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-07-25
The court recommended granting plaintiff's motion for default judgment and permanent injunction because the defendant willfully failed to defend the action and the plaintiff adequately alleged a breach of contract claim and grounds for injunctive relief.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-02-21
The court granted the plaintiff's motion for default judgment, awarding injunctive relief and attorney's fees and costs, because the defendants failed to appear or respond to the complaint alleging ADA violations.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-01-02
The court denied the plaintiff's emergency motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction because she failed to establish a substantial likelihood of success on the merits, demonstrate irreparable harm without an adequate legal remedy, provide for security, a
-
S.D. Fla.·
2024-12-31
The court granted the motion to appoint a receiver, finding that the parties' inability to agree on company operations created imminent danger of harm to the business and their interests within it.
-
Fla. 2d DCA·
2024-11-15
Former employees of Hydrologic Distribution Company appeal a trial court's grant of a temporary injunction preventing them from competing with their former employer and soliciting its customers and employees. The appellate court affirmed, holding that Hydrologic established legit
-
S.D. Fla.·
2024-10-16
University of Miami sued CANEUP LLC for trademark infringement based on the defendant's use of the "CANEUP" mark on clothing and apparel, alleging it was confusingly similar to the university's long-established "CANES" and orange-and-green "U" design marks. The court granted defa
-
Del. Ch.·
2024-08-21
The court held that specific performance is the appropriate remedy for the defendant's breach of contract, specifically the preemptive rights provision. The court ordered the defendant to make available to the plaintiff a warrant to purchase shares of common stock at a specified
-
M.D. Fla.·
2024-08-09
The court held that Plaintiff is entitled to permanent injunctive relief under the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act (FDUTPA) and the Lanham Act, despite the jury finding no actual monetary damages.
-
Fla. 1st DCA·
2023-10-25
-
Del. Ch.·
2022-11-21
The Court of Chancery dismissed the plaintiffs' case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, finding that they failed to establish a reasonable apprehension of future harm that would necessitate equitable relief. While the plaintiffs sought a permanent injunction, their claims f
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-11-15
The court denied the plaintiff's motions for clerk's default, permanent injunction, and summary judgment, and granted the plaintiff's motion to remove the demand for jury trial and monetary damages. The court granted in part and denied in part the defendant's motion to dismiss, d
-
13th Cir. Ct. App. Div.·
2022-09-21
Petitioner sought a writ of mandamus to compel the City to respond in writing to a March 3, 2022 demand letter under the Bert Harris Act. The court denied the petition because the City had already responded to Petitioner's initial claim and Petitioner had adequate legal remedies
-
S.D. Fla.·
2022-09-20
The court held that the rental agreement's terms and conditions were not incorporated by reference into the rental contracts, and plaintiffs did not suffer actual damages or have standing for injunctive relief.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-12-10
The court granted default judgment and a permanent injunction against defendants for committing wire fraud, finding sufficient basis in the pleadings and proper jurisdiction.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-09-17
The court granted Plaintiffs' motion for default judgment, finding sufficient basis in the pleadings for copyright infringement, civil conspiracy, invasion of privacy, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and violation of Florida's Sexual Cyberharassment Law, and also gr
-
Fla. 2d DCA·
2021-06-11
The trial court erred in concluding that physicians did not violate a nonsolicitation provision prohibiting treatment of former patients of Tampa Pain Relief Center during a twenty-four-month restricted period without written consent, where evidence showed the doctors treated 644
-
S.D. Fla.·
2021-02-28
The court granted the plaintiff's motion for the appointment of a receiver, finding it necessary to prevent waste and manage the property during foreclosure litigation.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2019-12-23
The court granted the United States' Renewed Motion for Preliminary Injunction, enjoining defendants from violating Internal Revenue employment tax reporting and payment requirements.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2019-08-14
Asphalt Paving Systems contracted with Southern States to perform micro-surfacing work to repair roadway rumble stripes and sought payment for work on the entire length of road completed, while Southern States paid only for the specific seven-foot divot sections. The court found
-
Del. Ch.·
2014-06-17
The Court recommends denying the respondents' motion to dismiss, finding it reasonably conceivable that the petitioner can establish a valid contract for specific performance of the real estate sale. The essential terms of the contract, including the property description and pric
-
Del. Super. Ct.·
2012-03-28
The court granted Plaintiff's motion to dismiss Defendants' counterclaims and David B. Small's motion to dismiss the Third-Party Complaint, with leave to re-plead. The court denied Defendants' motion for the Honorable Mary M. Johnston to sit by designation in the Court of Chancer
-
712 F. Supp. 2d 1285·
M.D. Fla.·
2010-04-27
The court denied CIBA's motion for a permanent injunction, finding that CIBA failed to prove irreparable harm or that the public interest would not be disserved by an injunction.
-
34 So. 3d 50·
Fla. 3d DCA·
2010-03-10
-
615 F. Supp. 2d 1347·
S.D. Fla.·
2009-02-25
The court granted summary judgment for the government on claims related to tax liens and unauthorized collection actions for certain tax years, but denied summary judgment on claims regarding the issuance of a notice of deficiency for 2004 taxes.
-
Del. Ch.·
2006-06-06
The Court of Chancery properly denied the plaintiff's claims for specific performance, rescission of the sales agreement, and damages. The plaintiff failed to demonstrate the inadequacy of legal remedies for specific performance, failed to prove intentional or negligent misrepres
-
895 So. 2d 537·
Fla. 1st DCA·
2005-03-11
The court denied a petition for writ of mandamus seeking to enforce child visitation provisions, holding that the petitioner had either waived his right to appeal or would have an adequate legal remedy through future appeal of a final order.
-
843 So. 2d 376·
Fla. 2d DCA·
2003-05-02
James Tobin appeals a temporary injunction preventing the North Naples Fire Control and Rescue District from paying him $300,000 in severance compensation. The Florida District Court of Appeal reversed because the circuit court failed to make the four required findings necessary
-
815 So. 2d 732·
Fla. 5th DCA·
2002-04-26
-
Del. Ch.·
2000-07-11
The Court held that even if the buyout agreement was procured by duress, the defendant ratified the agreement by accepting its benefits and partially performing his own obligations. Therefore, the Court entered judgment for breach of contract in the amount of $120,000 plus prejud
-
743 So. 2d 618·
Fla. 1st DCA·
1999-10-20
The court held that the petitioner has an adequate legal remedy by intervening in the trial court to seek modification of the injunction, thus the petition for writ of certiorari or prohibition is denied.
-
615 So. 2d 258·
Fla. 3d DCA·
1993-03-09
-
488 So. 2d 846·
Fla. 3d DCA·
1986-04-22
The court held that rescission of a settlement agreement is generally not available for delayed payment absent fraud, misrepresentation, or undue influence, but the appellant may amend his complaint for breach of contract.
-
416 F.2d 265·
7th Cir.·
1969-06-10
The court denied rehearing, finding no conflict with California precedent regarding conservatorship and capacity, and reaffirming its prior conclusion on undue influence.
-
393 F.2d 671·
D.C. Cir.·
1968-02-01
The court held that the insurer's legal remedy was not inadequate, and therefore the insured was entitled to a jury trial.
-
29 Fla. Supp. 22·
Dade Cty. Cir. Ct.·
1967-05-10
Property owners challenged a city commission directive prohibiting all construction on their property zoned for apartment use, seeking declaratory relief that they had the right to build a high-rise apartment building. The court held that under the city's zoning ordinances, the o
-
183 So. 2d 279·
Fla. 2d DCA·
1966-02-02
This case involves a patent attorney suing the executors of an estate for an accounting based on a contract for services. The court affirmed the dismissal of the equity suit and transfer to the law side, finding that a legal remedy was adequate.
-
14 Fla. Supp. 44·
Dade Cty. Cir. Ct.·
1958-12-11
Truly Nolen, a pest control company, sued Orkin Exterminating and individuals Pierce and Snyder for malicious interference with employment contracts, tortious inducement of breach, and unfair competition. The court found that Orkin and Pierce deliberately and maliciously enticed
-
239 F.2d 953·
D.C. Cir.·
1956-12-13
The court held that a minor shortage in the conveyed land, where not a substantial inducement or essential to the contract's purpose, does not justify rescission of an executed real estate contract. However, an award for out-of-pocket expenses for uncompleted work was affirmed.
-
190 F.2d 658·
D.C. Cir.·
1951-06-14
The court held that the trial court erred in granting an injunction because the attorney failed to demonstrate wrongful action by the tax collector or irreparable injury, and the assignments were for security, not absolute sale.
-
143 Fla. 788·
Fla.·
1940-07-23
The Florida Supreme Court affirmed dismissal of an equitable action seeking to enjoin a defendant from asserting a set-off defense in a pending common-law action. The court held that where a common-law court has adequate machinery to hear and resolve defenses to a set-off plea, e
-
138 Fla. 738·
Fla.·
1939-06-23
The Florida Supreme Court affirmed an interlocutory order that dissolved a temporary restraining order issued without notice and granted a new temporary injunction restraining defendants from removing or destroying shade and ornamental trees on disputed property. The court held t
-
117 Fla. 715·
Fla.·
1934-12-21
The Florida Supreme Court reversed a lower court's dismissal of a bill of complaint, holding that the complainant had stated a valid claim in equity. The case involved a dispute over personal property where the complainant alleged a usurious mortgage disguised as a bill of sale.
-
97 Fla. 375·
Fla.·
1929-03-19
Aetna Casualty & Surety Company appealed an order overruling its demurrer to a bill seeking to reform a performance bond and recover damages for a contractor's breach. The Florida Supreme Court held that reformation was inappropriate because the alleged mistake in the bond's date