Action For Permanent Injunction

30 Florida cases classified under this topic · sorted by citation count · browse and sort

• The Hollywood Beach Hotel Co. v. The City OF Hollywood
  329 So. 2d 10· Fla.· 1976-01-21 ·cited 97×
  Hollywood Beach Hotel Company obtained a zoning change and building permit to develop a 105-acre tract, but the City of Hollywood engaged in prolonged delays and ultimately attempted to rescind the zoning and impose a restrictive density ordinance. The Florida Supreme Court held
• Playtime Theaters, Inc. v. The City OF Renton
  748 F.2d 527· 9th Cir.· 1984-11-28 ·cited 43×
  The City of Renton failed to demonstrate a substantial governmental interest unrelated to suppressing speech, and the ordinance was more restrictive than necessary. The denial of fees for a second removal was not clearly erroneous.
• Int'l Union v. Mack Trucks, Inc.
  820 F.2d 91· 3d Cir.· 1987-06-05 ·cited 33×
  The court held that Mack's unilateral change of health insurance carriers violated the collective bargaining agreement and deprived the Union of a valuable bargaining chip, constituting substantial harm. The Norris-LaGuardia Act did not preclude injunctive relief.
• Donnell Douglas v. Sigler
  386 F.2d 684· 8th Cir.· 1967-11-28 ·cited 32×
  The court held that a state statute allowing for diminution of sentence based on good behavior is a conditional grant, not a vested right, and its forfeiture does not raise a federal constitutional issue unless administrative due process is violated.
• Larson v. Warren
  132 So. 2d 177· Fla.· 1961-07-26 ·cited 32×
  The Florida Supreme Court reversed two lower court decisions that had declared provisions of Florida's Driver's Financial Responsibility Act (Chapter 324) unconstitutional as violating due process. The Court held that the Act's license suspension provisions were valid exercises o
• The Tribune Co. v. Cannella
  438 So. 2d 516· Fla. 2d DCA· 1983-09-30 ·cited 27×
  The Tribune Company sought mandamus to compel release of Tampa police officers' personnel files requested under Florida's Public Records Act. The court held that such files are public records, criminal investigative exemptions do not apply to pre-incident personnel materials, and
• Jaroslav Sedivy v. Elliot L. Richardson
  485 F.2d 1115· 3d Cir.· 1973-09-26 ·cited 20×
  The court concurred with the result but expressed concern that the jurisdictional amount requirement of 28 U.S.C. § 1331 was not met, suggesting this issue requires further consideration.
• Int'l Soc'y FOR Krishna Consciousness OF Houston, Inc. v. City OF Houston
  689 F.2d 541· 5th Cir.· 1982-10-18 ·cited 19×
  The court held that the Houston ordinance regulating charitable solicitation, as amended, does not violate the First and Fourteenth Amendments by unduly burdening free speech or free exercise of religion.
• Gte Sylvania v. Consumer Prod. Safety Comm'n
  598 F.2d 790· 3d Cir.· 1979-04-30 ·cited 18×
  The court held that the Consumer Product Safety Act's disclosure requirements apply to information released under the Freedom of Information Act, and that the district court correctly enjoined disclosure.
• Island Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Bd.
  352 F.2d 735· 9th Cir.· 1965-10-29 ·cited 14×
  The court held that inter-island flights over the high seas between Hawaiian Islands are subject to federal regulation by the Civil Aeronautics Board, as Hawaii did not establish its channels as 'historic waters'.
• Mitchell v. Wright
  154 F.2d 924· 5th Cir.· 1946-04-24 ·cited 12×
  A state's judicial appeal process for voter registration denials is not a purely administrative remedy that must be exhausted before federal court intervention.
• Captain Susan R. Struck v. Secretary OF Defense
  460 F.2d 1372· 9th Cir.· 1971-11-15 ·cited 10×
  The petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing en banc were denied.
• Mullaney v. Hess
  189 F.2d 417· 9th Cir.· 1951-05-10 ·cited 8×
  The court held that the injunction against the collection of taxes under the Alaska Property Tax Act must be reversed because the appellees have an adequate remedy at law through the statutory protest and refund procedure.
• Ced's Inc. v. United States Env't Prot. Agency
  745 F.2d 1092· 7th Cir.· 1984-09-28 ·cited 6×
  The court held that the EPA had statutory authority under Section 114(a) of the Clean Air Act to inspect and copy business records of any person subject to the Act's requirements, regardless of whether the EPA had previously required those records to be maintained. The court also
• Abramson v. The Fla. Psychological Ass'n & Parke Fitzhugh
  610 So. 2d 447· Fla. 1st DCA· 1992-07-09 ·cited 4×
  State regulatory agencies lack the authority to settle disputes by waiving plain statutory licensing requirements for professional licensure, and equity does not compel enforcement of settlements that contravene express statutory provisions absent explicit statutory authorization
• Kelly v. Union Stockyards & Transit Co. of Chicago
  190 F.2d 860· 7th Cir.· 1951-08-08 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the district court lacked primary jurisdiction over the plaintiffs' claims regarding removal from the Open Order List, and thus properly denied the motion for a preliminary injunction.
• McCUE v. Heritage Farms Prop. Ass'n, Inc.
  141 So. 3d 672· Fla. 2d DCA· 2014-06-20 ·cited 3×
  The appellate court held that the trial court erred in granting a temporary injunction without specifying the reasons for its entry, as required by rule.
• United States v. Kahn
  304 F. Supp. 2d 1353· M.D. Fla.· 2004-02-03 ·cited 2×
  The court held that the federal government's power to enforce the Internal Revenue Code is an enumerated power, not a residual power, and therefore does not require a "notice of acceptance" of jurisdiction over land.
• Brannon v. Auto Ctr. Mfg. Co.
  393 So. 2d 75· Fla. 5th DCA· 1981-02-04 ·cited 1×
  The court held that it was error to enter a permanent injunction when damages for breach of a non-compete agreement were also sought and potentially settled.
• 100 Emerald Beach WAY, LC v. Thornton
  Fla. 4th DCA· 2022-06-08
  The appellate court affirmed a trial court's contempt order and permanent injunction, clarifying that an easement for ingress and egress does not permit parking or stopping. The court also addressed jurisdictional issues regarding the review of pre-judgment contempt orders, certi
• Page 1 of 33
  Del. Ch.· 2014-11-17
  The court recommended denying the plaintiff's request for a permanent injunction to remove the defendant's barn, finding that the relevant restrictive covenant was too vague and imprecise to be enforceable. The court also denied the plaintiff's request for specific performance of
• RCM LS II, LLC v. Lincoln Circle Assocs., LLC
  Del. Ch.· 2014-07-28
  The court held that the defendants breached the Right of First Offer (ROFO) Agreement by failing to provide a compliant "Property Offer Notice" before proceeding with negotiations and agreements with a third party, Rockrose. The notice failed to accurately state the sale price, o
• In & for New Castle Cnty. Deloitte & Touche USA LLP
  Del. Ch.· 2007-04-06
  The court granted partial summary judgment for Deloitte, finding it had a legitimate business interest in AutoNation, Burger King, and Ryder Systems, and that the two-year restriction in the noncompete agreement was reasonable for these clients. However, the court denied summary
• City of Wilmington v. Wilmington FOP Lodge #1
  Del. Ch.· 2003-10-29
  The court held that arbitration under a collective bargaining agreement cannot be compelled after the agreement's expiration when the facts giving rise to the dispute occurred after expiration, absent specific exceptions. The City of Wilmington was granted a permanent injunction
• Boyce v. Ivy Simpson and Donavan G. Williams
  746 So. 2d 507· Fla. 4th DCA· 1999-11-24
  Homeowners in Maplewood Addition sought a permanent injunction to prevent neighbors from operating an Adult Congregate Living Facility (ACLF) in their single-family home, claiming it violated restrictive covenants. The trial court denied the injunction, and the appellate court af
• Norris Grain Co. v. United States (In Re Norris Grain Co.)
  168 B.R. 264· M.D. Fla.· 1993-08-19
  The court affirmed the Bankruptcy Court's judgment, finding the tax assessments violated specific bankruptcy code sections but were not voided.
• Magee v. Bunting
  Del. Ch.·
  The court held that the plaintiff, Magee, owns the irrigation systems. The court found that the lease provision regarding improvements did not apply to pre-existing systems and that an oral agreement between Magee and the landlord's predecessor granted Magee ownership. Consequent