-
949 So. 2d 1066·
Fla. 2d DCA·
2007-01-05
·cited 47×
Homeowners appealed the denial of a mandatory injunction seeking to force Tampa Electric Company to remove large electrical transmission poles from their neighborhood. The court affirmed the summary judgment, holding that even if the poles constituted a nuisance, monetary damages
-
782 F.2d 995·
Fed. Cir.·
1986-01-28
·cited 40×
The court held that the patent claims were valid and infringed, but reversed the finding of patent misuse. It affirmed injunctions against some infringers but remanded for reconsideration of an injunction against another.
-
718 F.2d 299·
9th Cir.·
1983-10-12
·cited 30×
The court held that the appeal was not moot and affirmed the district court's preliminary injunction, finding it struck an appropriate balance between treaty fishing rights and conservation needs.
-
914 F.2d 582·
4th Cir.·
1990-09-19
·cited 22×
The court held that the defendants' blockading of abortion facilities violated 42 U.S.C. § 1985(3) by infringing on women's right to travel and affirmed the district court's grant of a permanent injunction.
-
246 So. 2d 162·
Fla. 3d DCA·
1971-03-23
·cited 22×
Sackett, a property owner adjacent to the Cocoplum Properties, sought a temporary injunction to prevent the City of Coral Gables from further considering a proposed zoning amendment. The District Court of Appeal affirmed the denial of the temporary injunction, holding that courts
-
453 So. 2d 1134·
Fla. 1st DCA·
1984-06-29
·cited 19×
Bailey appeals a preliminary injunction ordering him to open and operate the Spinnaker II nightclub and pay stipulated percentages of gross revenues to himself and co-owner Christo during the 1984 season. The court affirmed, holding that the trial court did not abuse its discreti
-
515 So. 2d 368·
Fla. 4th DCA·
1987-11-12
·cited 18×
M.G.K. Partners appeals the trial court's decision to grant a temporary injunction preventing it from leasing space in its shopping center to Domino's Pizza, based on a non-competition clause in the existing Stage Deli lease. The court affirmed, finding no clear abuse of discreti
-
276 F.2d 665·
1st Cir.·
1960-04-08
·cited 15×
The court held that the district court did not abuse its discretion in issuing a broad injunction against the sale of any securities by Hillsborough Investment Corporation, as the company's plan to issue new securities constituted an attempt to evade a prior injunction and circum
-
282 So. 3d 965·
Fla. 1st DCA·
2019-10-11
·cited 12×
Repeated unwanted communications directed at an ex-partner who has explicitly demanded no contact, including emails and flowers sent despite a cease-and-desist letter and law enforcement intervention, constitute stalking and satisfy the statutory requirements for a dating violenc
-
183 So. 2d 226·
Fla. 3d DCA·
1966-02-01
·cited 11×
Durable Uniform appealed interlocutory orders granting a temporary injunction against interference with contractual relationships and denying discovery and joinder of defenses. The Third District affirmed, finding no abuse of discretion in the injunction and no error in the disco
-
987 F.2d 939·
3d Cir.·
1993-02-04
·cited 8×
-
270 So. 3d 510·
Fla. 1st DCA·
2019-05-02
·cited 7×
Teresa McMillian sought an injunction for protection against stalking against her neighbor Billy Stone after he wrote a threatening letter in 2016 and subsequently walked past her house frequently. The trial court granted a one-year injunction, but the appellate court reversed, f
-
299 So. 3d 1114·
Fla. 3d DCA·
2020-01-02
·cited 6×
The appellate court reversed a permanent stalking injunction against Luis Santiago, finding insufficient evidence that his actions met the statutory definition of stalking. The court emphasized that the conduct must be willful, malicious, and repeated, and directed at the specifi
-
655 So. 2d 209·
Fla. 3d DCA·
1995-05-24
·cited 6×
U.S. 1 Office Corp. appeals from a trial court order granting Falls Home Furnishings, Inc. a temporary injunction preventing U.S. 1 from interfering with Falls' advertising sign on U.S. 1's building. The appellate court affirmed, finding the trial court did not abuse its discreti
-
271 So. 3d 1232·
Fla. 1st DCA·
2019-05-13
·cited 5×
Sumners appeals a trial court's issuance of a one-year injunction for protection against dating violence sought by Thompson after he persistently contacted her following their breakup and made an unannounced visit to her home. The appellate court affirmed the existence of a datin
-
829 So. 2d 1006·
Fla. 2d DCA·
2002-11-15
·cited 4×
Panamericano sought certiorari review of a trial court order requiring a $4 million bond to maintain a lis pendens. The Florida appellate court affirmed the bond requirement despite the trial court's erroneous finding that the action was founded on a duly recorded instrument, bec
-
973 So. 2d 614·
Fla. 3d DCA·
2008-01-23
·cited 3×
Briceño appeals the denial of his motion for a temporary injunction to preserve accrued interest on funds he claims are subject to a constructive trust. The court affirms, holding that the res of an alleged constructive trust is limited to the principal funds, not accrued interes
-
142 Fla. 176·
Fla.·
1940-03-01
·cited 3×
Monarch Orange Company sought to enjoin County Commissioner George Perry from destroying cattle gaps and gates on roads crossing the company's pastureland in Sumter County. The Florida Supreme Court affirmed the injunction, holding that Perry's authority as a county commissioner
-
327 So. 3d 889·
Fla. 5th DCA·
2021-09-02
·cited 2×
The appellate court affirmed the trial court's denial of a permanent injunction against stalking. The court found that the appellant had only proven one instance of statutorily defined stalking, while two instances are required for an injunction.
-
312 So. 3d 1036·
Fla. 2d DCA·
2021-03-05
·cited 2×
The appellate court reversed a temporary injunction because the trial court failed to make specific factual findings to support the injunction and did not hold an evidentiary hearing to determine the bond amount. The court emphasized the strict procedural requirements for tempora
-
282 So. 3d 937·
Fla. 3d DCA·
2019-09-25
·cited 2×
The appellate court affirmed a permanent injunction against a former nanny who engaged in stalking behavior after her termination. The court found sufficient evidence that the nanny's actions caused severe emotional distress and fear, meeting the statutory requirements for stalki
-
411 So. 2d 1375·
Fla. 4th DCA·
1982-04-07
·cited 2×
This case concerns whether grievance arbitration hearings between a teachers' union and a school board are subject to Florida's Government in the Sunshine Act. The appellate court affirmed the denial of a preliminary injunction, finding no abuse of discretion and noting the publi
-
987 F.2d 91·
2d Cir.·
1993-02-25
·cited 1×
The court held that Ikon Photographic Corp. infringed upon Nikon Inc.'s trademarks under the Lanham Act and New York law, and that a recall of Ikon's products was appropriate.
-
11th Cir.·
2026-06-24
The district court properly found the DOC liable for Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference based on systemic deficiencies in mental health care that effectively denied inmates access to constitutionally adequate care, without requiring renewed liability findings at the remedia
-
Fla. 3d DCA·
2025-08-06
Lee Kerzner appealed three circuit court orders from Miami-Dade County involving family court matters. The Third District Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court's decisions, applying the deferential abuse-of-discretion standard and finding no clear abuse of the court's broad di
-
Fla. 3d DCA·
2025-08-06
Lee Kerzner appealed three family court orders from Miami-Dade County. The Third District Court of Appeal affirmed the lower court's decisions, applying the abuse of discretion standard and finding the trial court properly exercised its broad discretion in the family law matters
-
Fla. 2d DCA·
2022-10-21
A commercial tenant (SHI) sued its condominium association (Association) for placing a dumpster structure that eliminated six parking spots in a common area. The appellate court held that the Association violated its own governing documents by obstructing the parking facilities a
-
Fla. 1st DCA·
2022-03-02
The appellate court reversed a domestic violence injunction, finding the petitioner lacked statutory standing because she did not prove she resided with the respondent. The court also reversed the denial of the respondent's motion to vacate the injunction based on new evidence.
-
264 So. 3d 942·
Fla. 4th DCA·
2018-12-19
An auto dealership and shopping center disputed the scope of a 1989 cross-access easement (CAA) that allowed ingress and egress between their properties. The shopping center's new owner terminated a 2014 month-to-month agreement permitting the dealership to load and unload vehicl
-
629 So. 2d 244·
Fla. 3d DCA·
1993-12-14
Rafael Zur appeals the trial court's denial of his motion to dissolve a temporary injunction preventing the sale of a rare World War II fighter aircraft (F-4U Corsair). The appellate court affirmed the injunction, finding that the original owner Wirth satisfied all three requirem
-
415 F.2d 775·
9th Cir.·
1969-08-25
The court held that the prisoner's action was frivolous and properly dismissed, and that the denial of an injunction was within the sound discretion of the district judge.