12,666 Florida cases classified under this topic, plus 447 listed through its narrower topics · sorted by citation count · see the citation graph · browse and sort
-
588 F.2d 235·
8th Cir.·
1978-11-29
·cited 20×
The court held that the district court's revised order was inadequate and ordered immediate promotion of qualified black firefighters, along with specific guidelines for acting captain assignments and future promotions, to remedy past discrimination.
-
586 F.2d 1126·
7th Cir.·
1978-11-08
·cited 20×
The Eleventh Amendment does not bar a money judgment against a county welfare department for unlawfully withholding child support payments, as such entities are not arms of the state and can satisfy judgments from their own funds. Claims for damages are not moot and may proceed.
-
582 F.2d 1316·
4th Cir.·
1978-09-05
·cited 20×
The court held that the panel erred in applying a two-year statute of limitations to § 1983 actions without regard to state survivability rules.
-
574 F.2d 874·
6th Cir.·
1978-04-12
·cited 20×
The court held that the out-of-state lawyers' procedural due process rights were violated by their removal from the case without a hearing, and that federal injunctive relief was appropriate because they lacked an adequate state remedy.
-
559 F.2d 1098·
7th Cir.·
1977-07-28
·cited 20×
The court held that the plaintiffs sufficiently alleged and proved violations of their Fourth and Eighth Amendment rights, incorporated through the Fourteenth Amendment, under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and that the trial court erred in dismissing the case based on Paul v. Davis.
-
554 F.2d 650·
5th Cir.·
1977-06-22
·cited 20×
The court held that claims seeking restoration of good time credits or immediate parole review are habeas corpus claims requiring exhaustion of state remedies, while claims challenging conditions of confinement may proceed. Claims of medical staff negligence do not rise to a cons
-
555 F.2d 142·
6th Cir.·
1977-05-20
·cited 20×
The court held that dismissal of the civil rights complaint was inappropriate without an evidentiary hearing on the applicability of the tolling statute for imprisonment.
-
555 F.2d 583·
6th Cir.·
1977-05-02
·cited 20×
The court held that the defendants were entitled to have their good faith defense submitted to the jury, as their reliance on an unwritten parole authority policy regarding bond forfeitures was not unreasonable as a matter of law.
-
551 F.2d 68·
5th Cir.·
1977-04-22
·cited 20×
The court held that a state prison's prohibition on inmates providing legal assistance to each other in civil rights and general civil matters is unconstitutional if the prison fails to provide a reasonable alternative.
-
548 F.2d 172·
6th Cir.·
1977-01-24
·cited 20×
The court affirmed the dismissal of the federal civil rights claims, finding that the defendants were entitled to judicial, prosecutorial, or Eleventh Amendment immunity, and thus dismissed the pendent state law claims.
-
545 F.2d 382·
3d Cir.·
1976-11-22
·cited 20×
The court held that the district court erred in finding no state action, reversing the summary judgment.
-
535 F.2d 1360·
2d Cir.·
1976-05-17
·cited 20×
The court held that a prisoner's individual claim for monetary damages is not rendered moot by a prior class action settlement that only provided injunctive and declaratory relief.
-
537 F.2d 248·
7th Cir.·
1976-04-05
·cited 20×
-
525 F.2d 113·
2d Cir.·
1975-10-24
·cited 20×
The court held that the district court lacked jurisdiction over the plaintiffs' claims, affirming the dismissal of the action.
-
516 F.2d 937·
5th Cir.·
1975-08-04
·cited 20×
The court held that a prisoner's complaint alleging inadequate medical care, including failure to diagnose and treat a back injury and other conditions, stated a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
-
519 F.2d 803·
4th Cir.·
1975-07-08
·cited 20×
The court held that the trial court erred in failing to make specific findings on the issue of mitigation of damages, requiring remand. The denial of attorney fees was affirmed.
-
520 F.2d 400·
2d Cir.·
1975-06-30
·cited 20×
The court held that the district court's order mandating specific bail hearing procedures constituted an improper intrusion into the state judicial system, violating principles of comity and federalism.
-
518 F.2d 1160·
8th Cir.·
1975-06-17
·cited 20×
The court held that the district court abused its discretion in denying declaratory relief, as the case presented an actual controversy ripe for determination with a useful purpose.
-
The court held that the award of damages must be vacated and remanded for findings on the defendants' good faith, while affirming the award of attorney's fees.
-
512 F.2d 850·
9th Cir.·
1975-03-28
·cited 20×
The dissenting judge argues that reinstatement is the appropriate remedy for a constitutional violation, even for a non-tenured teacher, and that a monetary award is insufficient to vindicate the employee's rights.
-
512 F.2d 378·
10th Cir.·
1975-03-11
·cited 20×
The court held that the temporary solitary confinement and forfeiture of good time and parole eligibility for escapees, as mandated by Colorado statutes, did not constitute cruel and unusual punishment or a denial of due process for which damages are recoverable under § 1983.
-
512 F.2d 201·
1st Cir.·
1975-03-11
·cited 20×
The court held that the Massachusetts Boardinghouse Lien Statute, Mass.G.L. c. 255, § 23, does not constitute state action for purposes of a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim, even though it permits private individuals to seize property without court order.
-
511 F.2d 1242·
10th Cir.·
1975-02-28
·cited 20×
The court held that the trial court's findings that teachers' non-renewal was due to teaching deficiencies and insubordination, rather than constitutionally protected activity, were supported by substantial evidence and not clearly erroneous.
-
509 F.2d 1358·
1st Cir.·
1975-02-06
·cited 20×
The court held that state officials could not unilaterally suspend court-ordered prison disciplinary and classification rules, even if they found them burdensome, without seeking modification through proper legal channels.
-
508 F.2d 1224·
2d Cir.·
1974-12-04
·cited 20×
The court held that the factual allegations in the complaint, taken as true, state a claim for relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for deliberate indifference to prisoners' medical needs.
-
504 F.2d 1037·
7th Cir.·
1974-10-24
·cited 20×
The court held that a plaintiff denied a meaningful opportunity to contest the designation and taking of her property due to procedural delays has a right of action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for deprivation without due process.
-
503 F.2d 607·
6th Cir.·
1974-09-20
·cited 20×
Peaceful repossession under Tennessee Code Ann. § 47-9-503 is not action under color of state law for purposes of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 or state action under the Fourteenth Amendment.
-
500 F.2d 1301·
9th Cir.·
1974-07-12
·cited 20×
A prosecutor is absolutely immune from civil liability for acts committed in the performance of duties integral to the judicial process, even if malicious or knowing.
-
499 F.2d 733·
9th Cir.·
1974-06-21
·cited 20×
The court held that allegations of performing surgery without consent and denying necessary pain relief for five days after surgery are sufficient to state a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and thus summary judgment was improperly granted.
-
493 F.2d 371·
3d Cir.·
1974-03-04
·cited 20×
The court held that the Erie Human Relations Commission lacked the capacity to sue under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 17(b) because its organizing ordinance did not grant it such power and it did not fit the exceptions for unincorporated associations.
-
488 F.2d 1215·
8th Cir.·
1973-12-06
·cited 20×
The court held that while a prisoner's claim challenging the fact or duration of confinement must be brought as a habeas corpus petition requiring exhaustion of state remedies, claims seeking declaratory and injunctive relief against the unconstitutionality of a statute are permi
-
486 F.2d 284·
8th Cir.·
1973-10-29
·cited 20×
The court held that the United States is liable under the FTCA for its own negligence in placing a prisoner in an inadequate facility, but not for the negligence of the county jailer or sheriff.
-
480 F.2d 936·
6th Cir.·
1973-06-26
·cited 20×
The court held that while plaintiffs may have suffered economic injury, the applicable statutes and case law do not permit a subsequent judicial remedy after legislative decisions.
-
479 F.2d 86·
8th Cir.·
1973-05-17
·cited 20×
The dissenting judge would apply Iowa's five-year general statute of limitations to the civil rights action.
-
473 F.2d 545·
8th Cir.·
1973-02-15
·cited 20×
The court held that a state tax break for federally funded housing, without more, does not constitute state action sufficient for a federal civil rights claim. It also held that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying leave to amend the complaint.
-
472 F.2d 438·
5th Cir.·
1973-01-19
·cited 20×
The court held that the Louisiana public school disciplinary statutes, school rules, and psychological testing practices did not violate the students' constitutional rights.
-
474 F.2d 395·
4th Cir.·
1973-01-15
·cited 20×
The court held that a school district's mandatory maternity leave policy, requiring teachers to cease work five months before expected childbirth, constituted sex discrimination and denied equal protection.
-
468 F.2d 810·
9th Cir.·
1972-10-19
·cited 20×
The court held that while the Adult Authority is immune from damages claims, a prisoner's claim of constitutional rights interference by unidentified state officials warrants further proceedings and opportunity to amend.
-
465 F.2d 1169·
5th Cir.·
1972-09-06
·cited 20×
-
462 F.2d 615·
4th Cir.·
1972-06-21
·cited 20×
The court held that Virginia's two-year statute of limitations applies to actions brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1982 for racial discrimination in real estate sales.
-
462 F.2d 111·
3d Cir.·
1972-06-12
·cited 20×
The court held that the district court properly dismissed the civil rights complaint, affirming the judgment of dismissal.
-
460 F.2d 1144·
6th Cir.·
1972-06-01
·cited 20×
The court held that the Kentucky five-year statute of limitations for actions upon a liability created by statute applies to claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 when no physical injury is involved.
-
456 F.2d 399·
8th Cir.·
1972-02-29
·cited 20×
A public school teacher discharged for insubordination is not constitutionally entitled to persist in teaching methods that contravene employer directives, and the hearing afforded was procedurally adequate.
-
453 F.2d 836·
6th Cir.·
1972-01-07
·cited 20×
The court held that an official's assault and illegal incarceration can be considered actions taken 'under color of state law' for a Section 1983 claim, and that judicial immunity does not protect officials acting entirely outside their jurisdiction.
-
454 F.2d 892·
9th Cir.·
1972-01-04
·cited 20×
The court held that informal, statewide procedural policies of the California Adult Authority are not subject to the three-judge court requirement of 28 U.S.C. § 2281, and that prisoners do not have a constitutional right to counsel or access to records in administrative parole a
-
447 F.2d 1025·
7th Cir.·
1971-09-02
·cited 20×
The dissenting judge believes the majority's interpretation of the due process clause to protect against arbitrary termination of public employment is an erroneous expansion of federal judicial power.
-
445 F.2d 412·
7th Cir.·
1971-07-13
·cited 20×
The court held that the expulsion of students from a private parochial school did not constitute state action, and therefore the Fourteenth Amendment did not apply.
-
442 F.2d 912·
2d Cir.·
1971-03-25
·cited 20×
The court held that New York's tolling statute for imprisoned persons applies even if they have legal capacity to sue, thus the inmate's civil rights claim was not time-barred.
-
436 F.2d 728·
5th Cir.·
1971-01-14
·cited 20×
The court held that school officials cannot prohibit students from wearing black armbands to protest the Vietnam War if the protest does not substantially disrupt school discipline, as such armbands are akin to pure speech protected by the First Amendment.
-
429 F.2d 1288·
10th Cir.·
1970-07-14
·cited 20×
The court held that the pro se complaint, alleging cruel and unusual punishment for 50.5 hours without food, stated a cause of action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and the dismissal was premature.