3,807 Florida cases classified under this topic, plus 3,026 listed through its narrower topics · sorted by citation count · see the citation graph · browse and sort
-
983 F.2d 1285·
3d Cir.·
1993-01-25
·cited 5×
The appellate court held that the plaintiffs' civil rights claims were not ripe for judicial review because they had not allowed the local zoning authorities to reach a final decision on the matter. The court vacated the district court's judgment and remanded with instructions to
-
The court found that the plaintiffs failed to establish a Section 2 Voting Rights Act violation because the evidence did not demonstrate that the at-large election system for judges in the Fourth Judicial Circuit and Duval County diluted the voting strength of black citizens.
-
964 F.2d 853·
8th Cir.·
1992-05-22
·cited 5×
The dissent argues the majority erred by applying Fed.R.Civ.P. 69(a) to allow a garnishment proceeding against the State of Missouri, misinterpreting Eleventh Amendment immunity and waiver principles.
-
The court held that the district court did not err in excluding evidence of a prior incident involving Jetton and a motorcyclist, nor in its judgment for the City. However, the court reversed the judgment against Jetton, finding the admission of evidence regarding the Caraway inc
-
945 F.2d 1416·
8th Cir.·
1991-10-01
·cited 5×
The court held that officers were not entitled to qualified immunity for arresting Peterson without probable cause and that the district court erred in dismissing remaining state law claims based on lawful arrest findings.
-
772 F. Supp. 1254·
M.D. Fla.·
1991-09-12
·cited 5×
The court denied defendants' motions to dismiss, finding the complaint adequately stated federal and state claims and that questions of official capacity and procurement were for the jury.
-
943 F.2d 270·
3d Cir.·
1991-08-21
·cited 5×
The court held that Ivy waived its right to reserve federal claims under England by unreservedly litigating them in state proceedings before attempting any reservation, and that the Rooker-Feldman doctrine divests the district court of jurisdiction over claims seeking review of s
-
The court held that the plaintiff's inverse condemnation claim was not ripe for adjudication because the plaintiff failed to utilize available state procedures for obtaining compensation.
-
The court held that independent contractors do not have a First Amendment right to be free from political considerations in the awarding of public contracts, and that the plaintiff did not possess a protected property interest in the renewal of its parking lot leases under the Fo
-
931 F.2d 1465·
11th Cir.·
1991-05-24
·cited 5×
The court held that prison officials' claim of probable cause to read inmate legal mail did not override the inmate's constitutional right to have such mail unread, and that the trial court properly denied motions based on this claim.
-
933 F.2d 781·
9th Cir.·
1991-05-21
·cited 5×
The court held that plaintiffs were not prevailing parties under 42 U.S.C. § 1988 because their claims were ultimately dismissed on ripeness grounds, and they failed to demonstrate a material alteration of the legal relationship with the defendants.
-
The court held that the defendants were entitled to judgment as a matter of law based on unrefuted facts presented in an affidavit.
-
The court held that the district court erred in dismissing the section 1983 claim because Kacal presented sufficient evidence of police harassment that significantly altered her liberty and property interests in operating her business. The court affirmed the dismissal of the Four
-
928 F.2d 788·
7th Cir.·
1991-04-05
·cited 5×
A municipality cannot be held liable under § 1983 for a constitutional violation merely by enforcing state law; a direct causal link between a municipal policy and the violation is required.
-
The court should remand the Fourteenth Amendment claim for trial because the damage to the trailer constituted an independent deprivation of property, and the Fourth Amendment applies to unreasonable seizures in civil proceedings.
-
The court affirmed the district court's grant of summary judgment, finding no constitutional violation.
-
903 F.2d 1006·
4th Cir.·
1990-05-25
·cited 5×
The court held that the plaintiff's claims for injunctive relief were moot due to the state court's final judgment, and his claims for damages under federal law failed because the defendant's actions did not constitute state action.
-
The court held that the plaintiff failed to allege an antitrust injury and that the defendants were immune from antitrust liability under the Noerr-Pennington doctrine.
-
A party is not considered a "prevailing party" under the Civil Rights Attorney's Fees Award Act of 1976, 42 U.S.C. § 1988, if they did not obtain any relief on the merits of their claims.
-
726 F. Supp. 1305·
S.D. Fla.·
1989-12-15
·cited 5×
When material factual issues are disputed at trial regarding a qualified immunity defense, the jury should resolve the factual disputes and determine whether a reasonable officer could have believed the conduct to be lawful.
-
718 F. Supp. 934·
S.D. Fla.·
1989-08-29
·cited 5×
The court held that Metropolitan Dade County's ordinance was constitutional and that the county was not liable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 because the alleged constitutional violations were not pursuant to a county policy or custom.
-
A prisoner has a liberty interest in good behavior time credits that cannot be denied without due process, including a hearing if the recommendation for credits is not automatically adopted.
-
877 F.2d 463·
6th Cir.·
1989-06-08
·cited 5×
The court held that Judge Shakoor's moratorium was an administrative act, not subject to absolute judicial immunity, but Shakoor was entitled to qualified immunity for damages. The court also reversed the denial of Morrison's motion to amend his complaint and the award of attorne
-
870 F.2d 1032·
5th Cir.·
1989-04-26
·cited 5×
The court affirmed the dismissal of the plaintiff's Section 1983 claims, finding he lacked standing for injunctive relief and that defendants were immune or had no duty to appoint counsel, but modified the dismissal of pendent state law claims to be without prejudice.
-
The court held that expenses for transporting state prisoners to federal court in response to a writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum are not taxable costs under 28 U.S.C. § 1920, and that a state entity's motion to intervene to recover such costs was untimely.
-
870 F.2d 1375·
8th Cir.·
1989-03-08
·cited 5×
The court held that a state hospital can regulate medical staff privileges to promote public service efficiency, and a doctor's failure to meet requirements constitutes voluntary withdrawal, not constructive revocation, especially when speech includes personal attacks causing dis
-
867 F.2d 318·
6th Cir.·
1989-02-09
·cited 5×
The court held that the police officers' letter to their chief, criticizing internal departmental matters, did not constitute speech on a matter of public concern and therefore was not protected by the First Amendment.
-
855 F.2d 763·
11th Cir.·
1988-09-20
·cited 5×
The court held that collateral estoppel cannot be applied against parties who have not had an opportunity to litigate the issue, even if the issue was litigated by another party in a prior action.
-
840 F.2d 840·
11th Cir.·
1988-03-23
·cited 5×
A simple breach of contract by the State does not constitute a denial of procedural due process rights actionable under Section 1983.
-
The court held that the amended Arizona statute governing tolling of the statute of limitations for imprisonment applied, and the plaintiff's claim was time-barred.
-
The court held that the school district did not violate the stay-put provision by placing Sean in special education, and the plaintiff failed to establish grounds for preliminary injunctive relief.
-
The court held that the district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the federal civil rights action based on abstention principles under Colorado River due to parallel state court proceedings.
-
822 F.2d 553·
5th Cir.·
1987-07-28
·cited 5×
The court held that a claim for deprivation of substantive due process is not barred by the Parratt/Hudson doctrine, but claims for procedural due process violations are barred if the state provides adequate post-deprivation remedies. Summary judgment for the district clerk was a
-
The plaintiffs have not sufficiently alleged concrete injury to themselves to satisfy the constitutional requirement of standing, thus the district court lacks jurisdiction.
-
An officer executing a facially valid arrest warrant does not violate the Fourth Amendment by arresting the wrong person if the officer acts reasonably under the circumstances, even if the warrant contains inaccurate information.
-
813 F.2d 891·
8th Cir.·
1987-03-09
·cited 5×
A court-appointed psychiatrist performing quasi-judicial functions is absolutely immune from suit, and pleading a conspiracy does not defeat this immunity.
-
The court held that an attorney's failure to disclose settlement terms foreclosing attorney's fees constituted a lack of candor warranting Rule 11 sanctions, even if subsequent legal arguments had arguable merit.
-
The court held that the district court erred in granting summary judgment for the plaintiff because the plaintiff failed to present evidence rebutting the presumption that the prosecutor exercised independent judgment in filing the criminal complaint, which insulates the arrestin
-
798 F.2d 361·
9th Cir.·
1986-08-22
·cited 5×
The court held that while the City's post-tow procedures violated due process, the appellant failed to prove damages and did not properly plead claims against individual defendants. The award of attorney's fees to the individual defendants was reversed.
-
The court held that the Virginia amendment restricting display of sexually explicit material to juveniles was facially unconstitutional as overbroad and a violation of the First Amendment, and that plaintiffs were entitled to attorneys' fees.
-
789 F.2d 881·
11th Cir.·
1986-05-15
·cited 5×
The court held that a district court cannot grant a directed verdict before trial when a party has requested a jury trial.
-
790 F.2d 500·
6th Cir.·
1986-05-13
·cited 5×
The Eleventh Amendment does not protect municipal corporations from state control, and federal courts should not adjudicate internal state disputes between political subdivisions.
-
787 F.2d 995·
5th Cir.·
1986-04-18
·cited 5×
A judge is immune from damages for judicial acts, and the right to self-representation in civil cases is statutory, not constitutional. Younger abstention does not apply to claims against private parties in completed state proceedings where no important state policies are implica
-
757 F.2d 1005·
9th Cir.·
1985-04-09
·cited 5×
The court held that an inadequate police investigation, without the deprivation of another recognized constitutional right, does not state a cognizable claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
-
The court held that the bankruptcy court's conversion orders were proper and that the district court did not err in affirming them. The court also held that the mandamus petition should be remanded for further proceedings.
-
The court held that the jury instructions regarding reasonable force and self-defense were proper, and that the district court correctly granted summary judgment for the city.
-
748 F.2d 224·
4th Cir.·
1984-11-16
·cited 5×
The court affirmed the district court's judgments but recommended a conditional dismissal allowing plaintiffs to reinstate their cases if sovereign immunity is upheld in state court.
-
746 F.2d 761·
11th Cir.·
1984-11-13
·cited 5×
A tenant has no constitutionally protected property interest in a lease renewal or in compelling a landlord to purchase its business, absent a binding agreement.
-
High school grooming regulations are constitutionally valid unless there is evidence of discriminatory enforcement or arbitrary effect. A student's interest in participating in athletics is not a protected property interest.
-
The court held that the plaintiff acquired a vested right to continued light industrial zoning under Iowa law based on substantial expenditures made in reliance on prior zoning and city encouragement, and that the city's subsequent rezoning violated this right.