35 U.S.C. § 289

17 Florida cases classified under this topic · sorted by citation count · browse and sort

• Braun Inc. v. Dynamics Corp. OF Am.
  975 F.2d 815· Fed. Cir.· 1992-09-08 ·cited 10×
  The court held that Waring infringed Braun's design patent, but reversed the finding of willful infringement and the trebling of profits. Trade dress claims were reversed and remanded.
• Schnadig Corp. v. Gaines Mfg. Co., Inc.
  620 F.2d 1166· 6th Cir.· 1980-05-08 ·cited 4×
  An infringer's income taxes and fixed expenses attributable to infringing activities should not reduce the 'total profit' recoverable by a design patentee under 35 U.S.C. § 289.
• L.A. Gear, Inc. v. Thom McAN Shoe Co. & Melville Corp. & Pagoda Trading Co., Inc.
  988 F.2d 1117· Fed. Cir.· 1993-02-16 ·cited 3×
  The court affirmed the district court's judgment finding liability for unfair competition based on trade dress infringement.
• Tolife Techs. Pty Ltd v. The Individuals
  S.D. Fla.· 2025-10-03
  The court granted default judgment for trademark and design patent infringement, awarding permanent injunctive relief and statutory damages.
• Teleties, LLC v. 1-18 As Identified in Schedule "A"
  M.D. Fla.· 2025-05-01
  The court granted the motion to convert the temporary restraining order into a preliminary injunction, finding that the plaintiff established a substantial likelihood of success on the merits, irreparable injury, a favorable balance of harms, and that the injunction would serve t
• Teleties, LLC v. 1-18 As Identified in Schedule "A"
  M.D. Fla.· 2025-04-09
  The court granted in part and denied in part the plaintiff's ex parte motion for a temporary restraining order, asset freeze, alternative service, and expedited discovery.
• Garrett Elecs., Inc. v. The Individuals
  S.D. Fla.· 2024-12-31
  The court recommended granting the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction against defendants for trademark and patent infringement and counterfeiting.
• The Kyjen Co., LLC v. The Individuals
  S.D. Fla.· 2024-12-06
  The court granted the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, restraining defendants from infringing on the plaintiff's design patent and ordering various third parties to assist in enforcing the injunction.
• PainTEQ, LLC v. Omnia Med., LLC
  M.D. Fla.· 2024-11-20
  The court held that while an expert's opinions on reasonable royalties for trademark infringement were unreliable, other opinions regarding patent infringement damages and trademark profit disgorgement were admissible.
• DiFOLD Inc. v. The Individuals
  S.D. Fla.· 2024-11-19
  The court granted Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, restraining Defendants from infringing on Plaintiff's design patents and ordering the preservation and restraint of assets.
• XYZ Corp. v. THE Individuals
  S.D. Fla.· 2024-11-15
  The court granted plaintiff's motion for default final judgment, finding that the defaulting defendants infringed plaintiff's patent and were liable for damages and injunctive relief.
• Peleg Design Ltd. v. The Individuals
  S.D. Fla.· 2024-11-08
  The court granted the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, restraining defendants from infringing on the plaintiff's patent and copyright.
• Purple Innovation, LLC v. The Individuals
  S.D. Fla.· 2024-07-29
  The court granted plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, enjoining defendants from using plaintiff's trademarks and patents in connection with counterfeit products.
• Kaiquan Huang v. The Individuals
  S.D. Fla.· 2023-09-21
  The court recommended granting the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction against defendants for patent infringement.
• XYZ Corp. v. The Individuals
  S.D. Fla.· 2023-04-04
  The court granted the plaintiff's motion for default final judgment, finding sufficient allegations for patent and copyright infringement, and awarded injunctive relief and statutory damages.
• Volkswagen Grp. of Am., Inc. v. Varona
  S.D. Fla.· 2021-05-18
  Volkswagen Group of America and Audi AG successfully pursued trademark infringement and design patent infringement claims against Andy Varona and his corporation Verotec Wheels, Inc., which sold counterfeit Audi wheel sets bearing Audi's trademarks on eBay. The court awarded Audi
• Universal Mfg. Co. & Potomac Indus., Inc. v. Honorable Oren R. Lewis
  381 F.2d 819· 4th Cir.· 1967-07-20
  The court held that mandamus would not issue because the petitioner, Universal, had moved for dismissal based on lack of jurisdiction and improper venue, and could not complain when the court granted dismissal on jurisdictional grounds.