-
525 F.2d 931·
5th Cir.·
1976-01-07
·cited 16×
The court held that the district court properly denied the petition for a writ of habeas corpus, finding no constitutional infirmity in the petitioner's conviction.
-
776 F.2d 1487·
11th Cir.·
1985-11-07
·cited 13×
The court held that Tucker's trial counsel was not ineffective at sentencing and that the district court did not err in denying an evidentiary hearing.
-
709 F.2d 690·
11th Cir.·
1983-07-11
·cited 8×
-
654 F.2d 707·
10th Cir.·
1981-07-22
·cited 6×
The court held that the prosecution failed to demonstrate a good-faith effort to secure the witness's presence at trial, thus violating the Sixth Amendment's confrontation clause.
-
418 F.2d 867·
10th Cir.·
1969-11-18
·cited 6×
The court held that a consecutive sentence for a subsequent crime runs independently of a prior conviction that is later declared void.
-
878 F.2d 1031·
7th Cir.·
1989-07-11
·cited 4×
The court held that the state court record was insufficient to determine if the prosecution had withheld material exculpatory evidence, requiring a remand for an evidentiary hearing.
-
492 F.2d 115·
5th Cir.·
1974-04-04
·cited 4×
-
469 F.2d 87·
9th Cir.·
1972-11-07
·cited 4×
The court held that the district court did not err in denying an evidentiary hearing on a habeas corpus petition challenging extradition.
-
506 F.2d 478·
8th Cir.·
1974-03-28
·cited 2×
The court held that not all material facts were adequately developed at the state court hearing, requiring an evidentiary hearing in the district court.
-
421 F.2d 270·
1st Cir.·
1970-01-22
·cited 2×
The court held that the district court's findings were not clearly erroneous, affirming the dismissal of the habeas corpus petition.
-
685 F.2d 927·
5th Cir.·
1982-08-26
The court held that the district court properly granted habeas relief because the state's role in the disappearance of a material witness violated due process, and the state court's findings on due diligence were not entitled to deference.