28 U.S.C. § 2254 Habeas Corpus

252 Florida cases classified under this topic, plus 657 listed through its narrower topics · sorted by citation count · see the citation graph · browse and sort

• Brown v. Lash
  432 F.2d 1129· 7th Cir.· 1970-09-30 ·via 28 U.S.C. § 2254(D)
  The court held that the facts were not adequately developed at the state coram nobis hearing, entitling the petitioner to an evidentiary hearing in federal district court on the voluntariness of his confession.
• Roberts v. Cupp
  428 F.2d 825· 9th Cir.· 1970-08-12 ·via 28 U.S.C. § 2254(D)
  The court held that the district court correctly dismissed the habeas corpus petition because the state's custody did not violate federal constitutional rights.
• Arland L. Gerberding v. State OF Minn.
  426 F.2d 247· 8th Cir.· 1970-05-18 ·via 28 U.S.C. § 2254(D)
  The court affirmed the denial of habeas corpus relief, holding that the state court's post-trial evidentiary hearing on confession voluntariness was a proper remedy and that the confession was voluntary under the totality of the circumstances.
• United States ex rel. Lawrence Denmark v. Honorable J. Edwin LaVALLEE
  426 F.2d 232· 2d Cir.· 1970-04-17 ·via 28 U.S.C. § 2254(D)
  A state procedure relying on the trial record for a post-conviction voluntariness hearing is adequate if the defendant had the opportunity for cross-examination.
• Harrison Jolly v. Crouse
  411 F.2d 808· 10th Cir.· 1969-05-26 ·via 28 U.S.C. § 2254(D)
  The federal court correctly dismissed the habeas corpus petition without a hearing, deferring to the state court's findings.
• United States ex rel. Flossie Bullock v. Warden, Westfield State Farm FOR Women
  408 F.2d 1326· 2d Cir.· 1969-04-04 ·via 28 U.S.C. § 2254(D)
  The court held that a guilty plea induced by a defense attorney's erroneous sentence estimate, rather than a promise or coercion by the court, is not involuntary under the Due Process Clause.
• United States ex rel. Ronald Futia v. Reincke
  397 F.2d 778· 2d Cir.· 1968-06-05 ·via 28 U.S.C. § 2254(D)
  The appellate court affirmed the district court's dismissal of the habeas corpus petition.
• United States ex rel. Ramon Rivera v. Follette
  395 F.2d 450· 2d Cir.· 1968-05-16 ·via 28 U.S.C. § 2254(D)
  The court held that the state court's denial of the appellant's motion to withdraw his guilty plea was not erroneous, and thus the federal court was not required to hold an evidentiary hearing on his habeas corpus petition.