-
S.D. Fla.·
2024-01-03
The court held that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus must be denied because the petitioner failed to establish that the BOP revoked his Federal Time Credits without due process or that such credits could be applied to shorten his term of supervised release.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-12-19
The court held that the pro se plaintiff's complaint must be dismissed because it fails to state a claim, names improper defendants entitled to immunity, and raises an improper claim for excessive bail under § 1983. The motion to proceed in forma pauperis was also denied.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-11-29
A federal prisoner cannot use a § 2241 habeas petition to challenge the validity of his sentence if a § 2255 motion is available and adequate.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-09-26
The court held that the Bureau of Prisons correctly calculated the petitioner's sentence, and he is not entitled to additional credit for time served or aggregation of his sentences under the governing statutes.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-09-18
The court held that the petitioner's claims for vacating his sentence were meritless, procedurally defaulted, or contradicted by the record, and thus his motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence was denied.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-09-13
The court held that a federal prisoner must exhaust administrative remedies before filing a petition for writ of habeas corpus challenging the Bureau of Prisons' sentence calculation.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-09-11
The court held that the petitioner failed to exhaust administrative remedies and, alternatively, that the Bureau of Prisons properly calculated his earned time credits.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-08-31
The court held that a federal sentencing judge's recommendation for prisoner placement does not bind the Bureau of Prisons, and a federal sentence does not begin to run until a state prisoner is turned over to federal authorities after serving their state sentence.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-08-25
The court held that a federal prisoner cannot challenge the validity of his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 if the remedy under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is available and adequate.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-07-27
The court held that a federal prisoner cannot use a § 2241 petition to challenge the validity of his sentence when a § 2255 motion is available.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-07-19
The district court denied a former soldier's petition for a writ of habeas corpus, finding that his claims were either procedurally barred due to failure to exhaust military remedies or had been fully and fairly considered by the military courts.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-07-12
A federal prisoner's petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 challenging the Bureau of Prisons' calculation of sentence credits must be dismissed if the prisoner has failed to exhaust administrative remedies and does not demonstrate futility or exceptional cir
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-06-23
The court held that a petitioner's failure to exhaust administrative remedies for earned time credits under the First Step Act warrants dismissal of a § 2241 petition, absent demonstrated futility or extraordinary circumstances.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-06-23
A federal prisoner cannot use a § 2241 habeas petition to challenge the legality of his sentence when § 2255 provides an adequate remedy, even if the prisoner is procedurally barred from filing a successive § 2255 motion.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-06-09
The court held that a petitioner's failure to exhaust administrative remedies requires dismissal of a § 2241 petition, even if the petitioner claims futility, unless extraordinary circumstances are shown.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-05-31
The court adopted the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, denying the petition for a writ of habeas corpus.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-05-26
A federal prisoner cannot challenge the validity of his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 unless the remedy under § 2255 is inadequate or ineffective.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-05-26
A federal prisoner cannot use a § 2241 habeas petition to challenge the validity of his sentence if the § 2255 remedy is available and adequate.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-05-26
The court held that a federal prisoner cannot use a § 2241 habeas petition to challenge the validity of his sentence when a § 2255 motion is available, even if that claim has been previously rejected.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-05-22
A federal inmate's petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 challenging the Bureau of Prisons' calculation of sentence credits must be dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies, as the Eleventh Circuit has not recognized a futil
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-05-15
The court held that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is moot because the petitioner has been released from custody and has received the relief sought.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-04-26
A federal prisoner cannot use a § 2241 habeas petition to challenge the validity of his conviction or sentence when the § 2255 remedy is available and adequate.
-
N.D. Fla.·
2023-04-24
The court held that it lacks jurisdiction to release Petitioner under the CARES Act because she failed to exhaust administrative remedies and cannot decide abstract legal issues.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-04-17
The court held that the petitioner's habeas corpus petition was untimely filed, as it was filed more than one year after the facts supporting his claim were discoverable.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-04-12
The court held that a federal prisoner must exhaust administrative remedies through the Bureau of Prisons' Administrative Remedy Program before filing a petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 challenging the execution of his sentence.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-04-12
The court held that a petitioner must exhaust administrative remedies before filing a § 2241 petition, and this petitioner failed to do so.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-02-24
The court held that the petitioner received all due process rights to which he was entitled and that sufficient evidence supported the prison disciplinary board's decision to revoke good time credits.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-01-26
The court held that a petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 is unavailable to challenge the validity of a sentence except on very narrow grounds not present here.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-11-22
A federal court cannot grant a pre-trial detainee's habeas corpus petition seeking to intervene in an ongoing state criminal proceeding, absent extraordinary circumstances.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2022-11-21
First Step Act earned time credits cannot be applied to shorten a term of supervised release, but may allow for earlier transfer to supervised release.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2022-10-21
The federal court dismissed a pretrial detainee's habeas petition because the Younger abstention doctrine barred intervention in an ongoing state criminal prosecution.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-10-17
The court denied the motion for reconsideration because the petitioner failed to demonstrate manifest errors of law or fact in the original dismissal of his habeas petition.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-10-04
The court held that a habeas petition challenging immigration detention is moot once the petitioner is released from custody and placed under an order of supervision.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-08-10
The court held that the petition for writ of habeas corpus was prematurely filed because the petitioner's removal period had not yet begun due to a stay of removal granted by the Third Circuit Court of Appeals.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-06-22
The court held that the petitioner failed to exhaust his administrative remedies because he did not properly complete the grievance process, even after learning of a denial.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-06-21
The court held that the petitioner received adequate due process in his prison disciplinary proceeding and that there was sufficient evidence to support the disciplinary decision.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2022-06-03
The court held that a habeas petition challenging post-removal detention should be denied when the alien's removal is imminent and reasonably foreseeable, even if detention exceeds six months, especially when the alien's actions contributed to delays.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2022-05-26
The court held that Younger abstention doctrine compelled dismissal of the federal habeas petition due to an ongoing state civil commitment proceeding that is akin to a criminal prosecution.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-05-22
The court held that a federal prisoner cannot use a § 2241 habeas petition to challenge the validity of his sentence when the § 2255 remedy is available and adequate.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2022-05-20
The federal court must abstain from hearing a pretrial detainee's habeas corpus petition challenging his state prosecution due to the Younger abstention doctrine.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-03-03
The court held that a federal inmate cannot use a § 2241 petition to challenge the validity of a sentence except on very narrow grounds not present here.
-
N.D. Fla.·
2022-02-28
The court held that it lacked jurisdiction to consider the inmate's request for compassionate release and that a civil action was not the proper vehicle to challenge the service of her sentence.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2022-02-27
The court held that it lacked jurisdiction to consider a successive habeas corpus petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 when the petitioner had not obtained authorization from the appropriate court of appeals.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-02-17
The court held that the petitioner's claims regarding his second conditional release and the extension of his sentence expiration date were without merit under state law, and thus not grounds for federal habeas relief.
-
N.D. Fla.·
2022-02-17
A federal prisoner's claim of actual innocence based on a subsequent change in circuit precedent is not cognizable under the savings clause of 28 U.S.C. § 2255(e) and cannot be raised in a § 2241 habeas petition if § 2255 provides an adequate remedy.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2022-01-19
The court held that the petitioner failed to state a claim for relief in his habeas petition because he did not adequately allege the trigger date for the removal period and his conditions of confinement claim is not cognizable in a habeas petition.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-12-03
The court held that a federal inmate cannot use a § 2241 petition to challenge the validity of his sentence when the narrow exceptions do not apply.
-
N.D. Fla.·
2021-11-18
The court held that a petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 requires the petitioner to be 'in custody,' and absent this, the court lacks subject matter jurisdiction.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2021-10-15
The court held that a federal habeas petition challenging ongoing state criminal proceedings must be dismissed under the Younger abstention doctrine and for failure to state a claim.
-
N.D. Fla.·
2021-10-15
The court recommended dismissal of the habeas corpus petition because the petitioner failed to pay the filing fee or seek leave to proceed in forma pauperis, despite multiple opportunities and warnings.