28 U.S.C. § 1733

13 Florida cases classified under this topic · sorted by citation count · browse and sort

• Finnegan v. United States
  204 F.2d 105· 8th Cir.· 1953-04-30 ·cited 118×
  The court held that the trial court did not err in denying the defendant's preliminary motions, admitting evidence, or in its jury instructions, and that sufficient evidence supported the conviction.
• Bayless v. United States
  381 F.2d 67· 9th Cir.· 1967-07-19 ·cited 98×
  The court held that the appellant's conviction for escape and burglary was valid, affirming the district court's judgment.
• Dit la Porte v. United States
  300 F.2d 878· 9th Cir.· 1962-03-02 ·cited 72×
  Copies of Selective Service Form 153, used to document failure to report for civilian work, were properly admitted into evidence as business records and official statements.
• United States v. Farris
  517 F.2d 226· 7th Cir.· 1975-05-30 ·cited 24×
  Officially certified computer data compilations are self-authenticating under federal rules and statutes, and evidence of prior or subsequent failures to file tax returns is admissible to prove intent.
• United States v. Ream
  491 F.2d 1243· 5th Cir.· 1974-03-29 ·cited 19×
  The court held that the trial court did not err in denying an evidentiary hearing, admitting government records, or in its jury composition rulings.
• Colvin v. United States
  479 F.2d 998· 9th Cir.· 1973-06-08 ·cited 18×
  The court held that admitting an eyewitness statement from an accident report and testimony about the deceased's earnings from an unproduced diary constituted error.
• United States v. Baltrunas
  416 F.2d 401· 10th Cir.· 1969-10-10 ·cited 12×
  The court held that the failure to instruct the jury that the defendant must have known the property was stolen from the government affects substantial rights and requires reversal.
• United States v. Downing
  454 F.2d 373· 10th Cir.· 1972-01-27 ·cited 10×
  The court held that the defendant's Selective Service file, including a letter reporting his failure to submit to induction, was admissible under 28 U.S.C. § 1733 and did not violate his Sixth Amendment right to confrontation.
• United States v. Wendt
  452 F.2d 679· 9th Cir.· 1971-12-03 ·cited 8×
  The court held that the evidence of refusal to submit to induction was admissible hearsay and that the appellant's arguments regarding the timing of his physical examination and classification were without merit.
• United States v. Wilson
  535 F.2d 521· 9th Cir.· 1976-05-05 ·cited 6×
  The court held that the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction, federal jurisdiction was established, and the sentence was not excessive due to concurrent sentencing.
• Timms v. United States
  403 F.2d 879· 5th Cir.· 1968-11-22 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the trial court did not err in its jury instructions on insanity, and that there was sufficient admissible evidence of the defendant's legal confinement to sustain the conviction.
• Morton W. Southard and James L. Hansberger v. United States
  218 F.2d 943· 9th Cir.· 1955-01-07 ·cited 4×
  Government sales documents create a prima facie case for sale and delivery unless the documents themselves raise doubt. The judgment for the larger sale is affirmed, but the smaller sale is reversed due to a delivery receipt variance.
• Alamo Water Transp. Co. v. United States
  404 F.2d 54· 5th Cir.· 1968-11-22
  The court held that the appellant failed to properly object to the admissibility of the exhibit at trial, and even if they had, the exhibit was properly admitted and had probative value.