28 U.S.C. § 1404(A) (Transfer Of Venue)

363 Florida cases classified under this topic · sorted by citation count · browse and sort

• SOO Line R.R. Co. v. Overton
  992 F.2d 640· 7th Cir.· 1993-03-31
  The dissent argues that the majority's analysis is incompatible with Supreme Court jurisprudence on constitutional limitations on choice of law.
• Berman v. Cunard Line, Ltd.
  771 F. Supp. 1175· S.D. Fla.· 1991-01-09
  The court held that a forum selection clause in a cruise ticket should not be enforced if the passenger lacked actual notice of the clause and the clause was part of an unnegotiated form contract, especially when the chosen forum has no connection to the incident and the passenge
• Dahlberg v. Dr. David L. Harris, Interstate Med. Ctr., P.A.
  916 F.2d 443· 8th Cir.· 1990-10-10
  The Wisconsin borrowing statute, Wis.Stat. § 893.07, does not require the adoption of the commencement provision of the jurisdiction whose statute of limitations is borrowed; Wisconsin's commencement provision applies instead. The court reversed the grant of summary judgment.
• Anderson v. United States
  898 F.2d 751· 9th Cir.· 1990-03-19
  The court affirmed the district court's denial of the habeas petition, finding no merit to the petitioner's claims regarding his federal sentence, due process, or custodial status.
• Chester Banks & Mary Banks v. Sheppard
  435 F.2d 1218· 9th Cir.· 1971-01-11
  The court held that Rule 4(e) does not grant discretionary power for nationwide substituted service absent a specific federal statute authorizing it.
• Saunders P. Lemon v. Honorable John H. Druffel
  253 F.2d 680· 6th Cir.· 1958-04-01
  A writ of mandamus is not appropriate to review a district court's order transferring venue under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) unless there is a clear abuse of discretion or usurpation of judicial power.