-
M.D. Fla.·
2024-09-24
The court held that the plaintiff failed to establish personal jurisdiction over the Zupnicks and failed to properly allege subject-matter jurisdiction and venue for Specialty Rx, leading to dismissal of the claims against them.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2024-07-16
The court held that the plaintiff's complaint was a shotgun pleading and failed to state a claim, and his motion to proceed in forma pauperis was insufficient.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2024-03-27
The court granted the defendant's motion to transfer the case to the Southern District of Florida, finding the first-filed rule applicable and that the balance of convenience favored transfer.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2024-02-12
A magistrate judge has the authority to transfer a case for improper venue.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-12-04
The court granted a Temporary Restraining Order, finding plaintiffs had a substantial likelihood of success on their claims for violation of the Defend Trade Secrets Act and tortious interference with business relationships, and that irreparable harm would result from disclosure
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-11-07
Venue is improper in the Middle District of Florida because no substantial part of the events giving rise to the claims occurred there, and the injured third-party claimants are indispensable parties who cannot be joined, requiring dismissal of the action.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-08-15
A Florida company that manufactures patio umbrellas sued a Pennsylvania corporation for trade dress infringement, trademark infringement, and unfair competition, alleging the defendant copied its distinctive umbrella design and trade dress. The court denied the defendant's motion
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-06-26
The court held that venue was improper in the District of South Carolina and transferred the case to the District of Florida.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-06-26
The court held that venue was improper in the District of South Carolina and transferred the case to the Southern District of Florida.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-08-22
The court held that venue is proper in the Middle District of Florida and denied the defendant's motion to transfer the case, granting the plaintiff's motion to amend the complaint.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-04-25
The court held that the plaintiff's amended complaint failed to state a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 because it did not allege a violation of federal law or actual injury, and granted the plaintiff leave to amend.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2022-03-31
The court held that it lacked personal jurisdiction over the defendant because the defendant's contacts with New York were not sufficient to establish general or specific jurisdiction, and venue was therefore improper.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-10-18
The court held that the defendant's alleged trademark infringement through an accessible and accessed website in Florida constituted a tortious act within the state, establishing personal jurisdiction and proper venue.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2021-09-08
The court held that venue was improper in the Southern District of Florida and ordered the case transferred to the Middle District of Florida in the interest of justice.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-09-08
The court held that venue was improper in the Southern District of Florida and ordered the case transferred to the Middle District of Florida.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-07-19
The court granted the defendant's unopposed motion to transfer venue because the transferee district meets the statutory requirements and serves the convenience of the parties and witnesses.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-04-12
The court held that the proper venue for the plaintiff's civil rights complaint was the Middle District of Florida, not the Eastern District of Michigan.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-04-09
The court held that the plaintiff's motion to transfer venue to the Middle District of Florida is granted because changed circumstances have rendered the original venue improper and the Middle District is a more convenient and appropriate forum.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2021-04-09
The court held that the plaintiff's motion to transfer venue to the Middle District of Florida should be granted because changed circumstances made the original venue improper and the Middle District is a more convenient and appropriate forum.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2020-09-24
The court held that the convenience of the parties and witnesses, and the interest of justice, weighed in favor of transferring the case to the Southern District of New York.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2020-07-22
The court held that the plaintiff failed to adequately plead the amount in controversy for diversity jurisdiction as to DAS and granted leave to amend, but found venue proper for DAS.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2020-06-05
The court held that venue was improper in the District of South Carolina and properly transferred the case to the Southern District of Florida.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2019-12-03
The court held that the plaintiff's complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted due to improper joinder of unrelated claims and failure to allege actionable constitutional violations.
-
154 F.R.D. 117·
M.D. Fla.·
1998-07-02
The court granted the motions to transfer the case to the Middle District of Tennessee, deferring ruling on the motions to dismiss.
-
942 F.2d 761·
10th Cir.·
1991-08-19
Venue for a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action is proper in any district where the claim arose or where any defendant resides, even if defendants reside in different districts within the same state, under 28 U.S.C. § 1392(a).
-
233 F.2d 23·
D.C. Cir.·
1956-04-30
The court held that the trial court erred in making findings of fact regarding the marriage's validity when dismissing for lack of jurisdiction, and that the case should be remanded for dismissal on jurisdictional grounds.