521 Florida cases classified under this topic, plus 15 listed through its narrower topics · sorted by citation count · browse and sort
-
11th Cir.·
2023-05-31
The Eleventh Circuit held that it lacked appellate jurisdiction over a district court order compelling insurance companies to submit to appraisal of hurricane damage claims, finding the order was a non-final interlocutory order not immediately appealable under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)
-
11th Cir.·
2022-08-15
The Eleventh Circuit held that it lacked jurisdiction to review an order expanding a previously created receivership estate because it was neither an order appointing a receiver nor an order granting or modifying an injunction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a).
-
998 F.2d 824·
10th Cir.·
1993-07-07
The court held that the Colorado State Board of Agriculture violated Title IX by discontinuing the women's softball team and that the district court did not err in ordering reinstatement and specific remedial actions.
-
993 F.2d 1023·
2d Cir.·
1993-05-17
The court held that the district court's order clarifying the hiring order to grant an absolute preference to minority teachers for layoffs constituted an impermissible modification of the consent decree and violated the Equal Protection Clause.
-
986 F.2d 1055·
7th Cir.·
1993-02-16
A newsstand is a structure, not speech, and thus not protected by the First Amendment. Therefore, a facial challenge to the ordinance is not permitted.
-
981 F.2d 543·
D.C. Cir.·
1992-12-29
Transfer orders under 28 U.S.C. § 1631 are not appealable, and a writ of mandamus is not warranted as the district court did not abuse its authority in transferring the case.
-
975 F.2d 695·
10th Cir.·
1992-09-14
The court held that it has jurisdiction to review an injunction barring contribution/indemnity claims, even if improperly certified under Rule 54(b), and that the FDIC was not the real party in interest to request such a bar order.
-
964 F.2d 980·
10th Cir.·
1992-05-18
The court held that the district court erred in enjoining Interdisciplinary Treatment Teams (IDTs) from considering the availability of community services when making placement recommendations, as such consideration is part of reasonable professional judgment under the Due Proces
-
961 F.2d 71·
5th Cir.·
1992-05-01
A suspended attorney cannot collect fees for legal work performed in violation of the suspension order, and a clear suspension order can form the basis for a criminal contempt conviction.
-
951 F.2d 152·
7th Cir.·
1991-12-20
The court held that an employer seeking to avoid interim ERISA withdrawal payments must make an affirmative showing that the pension fund lacks a colorable claim and must demonstrate irreparable harm.
-
944 F.2d 313·
6th Cir.·
1991-09-20
The court held that the appeal was properly before it, that certain plaintiffs had standing and their claims were not time-barred, but that the futility of arbitration needed to be determined for other plaintiffs.
-
934 F.2d 1389·
6th Cir.·
1991-05-30
The court held that the "permanent injunction" was a preliminary injunction, that the TRO extended by stipulation became a preliminary injunction, and that the April 12 contempt order's fine was criminal, while the incarceration was civil.
-
926 F.2d 859·
9th Cir.·
1991-02-15
The court held that it lacked jurisdiction to review the district court's order denying a stay of foreclosure proceedings because the order was not a final decision, nor did it meet the criteria for appeal under the collateral order doctrine or as an interlocutory injunction.
-
925 F.2d 450·
D.C. Cir.·
1991-02-08
The court held that the district court's order granting a stay of proceedings and denying immediate discovery in a Freedom of Information Act suit is not a final judgment or an appealable interlocutory order, thus the appellate court lacks jurisdiction.
-
883 F.2d 333·
5th Cir.·
1989-07-26
The court held that an undertaking, waiving damage limitations, is a valid substitute for an increased bond when it adequately protects the non-moving party and posting the bond would cause undue hardship.
-
873 F.2d 1233·
9th Cir.·
1989-04-21
The court held that an order directing a bank to turn over funds to a receiver is not an appealable interlocutory order under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291, 1292(a)(1), or 1292(a)(2).
-
440 F.2d 765·
S.D. Fla.·
1988-08-25
The court held that the defendant employer remained bound by the collective bargaining agreement and its renewals, including fringe benefit obligations, due to its failure to provide timely notice of termination.
-
836 F.2d 47·
1st Cir.·
1988-01-22
A stay order pending arbitration is appealable if the underlying suit is legal in nature, and under New York law, an arbitration clause is a material addition requiring express assent, which was not present here.
-
825 F.2d 1564·
11th Cir.·
1987-08-31
The denial of a motion to stay proceedings pending arbitration is not an appealable order under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1) unless the underlying action is one at law and the stay was sought to determine an equitable defense or counterclaim.
-
821 F.2d 644·
Fed. Cir.·
1987-06-24
An interlocutory order that effectively denies an injunction is appealable under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1) only if it causes serious, irreparable consequences that can only be challenged by immediate appeal.
-
818 F.2d 532·
6th Cir.·
1987-05-11
The court held that an order staying litigation pending arbitration is not appealable under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1) if the underlying action is predominantly equitable in nature.
-
794 F.2d 1123·
6th Cir.·
1986-07-08
The court held that it had interlocutory jurisdiction over certain portions of the district court's orders denying injunctive relief, but affirmed those denials due to the contractor's substantial completion of the work and the plaintiff's delay in seeking equitable relief.
-
787 F.2d 117·
3d Cir.·
1986-03-28
The court held that an appeal from an order denying a motion to dissolve an injunction is limited to reviewing the denial itself, not the original injunction, and requires a showing of changed circumstances.
-
765 F.2d 399·
3d Cir.·
1985-06-25
The court held that the district court erred in granting summary judgment declaring a New Jersey statute unconstitutional and vacating an election, as the plaintiff failed to demonstrate a causal connection between the statute and the election outcome.
-
709 F.2d 178·
3d Cir.·
1983-05-17
The court held that an order denying a pre-trial motion to enforce a forum selection clause is reviewable as a collaterally final order under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and that the denial of a forum non conveniens claim is not collaterally final. The court also found that it had discreti
-
680 F.2d 29·
5th Cir.·
1982-07-09
The court held that a federal employee seeking an injunction against discharge must exhaust administrative remedies and meet the stringent requirements of Sampson v. Murray, which Garcia failed to do.
-
673 F.2d 645·
3d Cir.·
1982-02-26
-
468 F.2d 607·
1st Cir.·
1972-10-12
The court held that an order denying a motion for summary judgment, even if it resolves some issues on the merits, is not an appealable interlocutory order under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1) if genuine issues of material fact remain on other claims.