18 U.S.C. § 2314 (Transportation Of Falsely Made Securities)

11 Florida cases classified under this topic · sorted by citation count · browse and sort

• Marteney v. United States
  216 F.2d 760· 10th Cir.· 1954-11-03 ·cited 106×
  The court held that an indictment alleging the interstate transportation of a warehouse receipt that was factually false in its representations, but genuine in its execution, does not state an offense under 18 U.S.C. § 2314.
• McGEE v. United States
  402 F.2d 434· 10th Cir.· 1968-10-30 ·cited 92×
  The court held that the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction and that the trial court did not err in its rulings on severance, identification testimony, or jury instructions.
• United States v. Smith
  546 F.2d 1275· 5th Cir.· 1977-02-14 ·cited 74×
  The court held that the photographic identification procedure was not impermissibly suggestive and that the evidence was insufficient to support the conviction on Count II.
• United States v. Rogers
  475 F.2d 821· 7th Cir.· 1973-03-07 ·cited 34×
  The court held that markings on money orders were sufficient to infer interstate movement and that compelling handwriting exemplars in specific forms did not violate constitutional rights. The court also found that a witness's Fifth Amendment refusals did not unduly prejudice the
• United States v. Johnson
  504 F.2d 622· 7th Cir.· 1974-10-18 ·cited 22×
  The court held that the defendant's actions constituted 'falsely made' securities under 18 U.S.C. § 2314, and that knowledge of interstate transportation could be inferred from the money orders' markings.
• United States v. Bowers
  739 F.2d 1050· 6th Cir.· 1984-04-20 ·cited 20×
  The court held that the evidence was sufficient to sustain the convictions for conspiracy and substantive violations related to a scheme involving 'ringer' horses, and that various evidentiary and statutory challenges raised by the defendants lacked merit.
• United States v. Brown
  246 F.2d 541· 2d Cir.· 1957-07-29 ·cited 14×
  The court held that the forged supporting documents, while necessary for payment, did not render the drafts themselves 'falsely made' under the statute.
• United States v. Flick
  516 F.2d 489· 7th Cir.· 1975-05-15 ·cited 12×
  The court held that there was sufficient evidence to sustain the jury's verdict on each count of conviction, and that the trial court did not err in denying motions for severance, admitting evidence of other offenses, or in treating certain substantive counts as separate violatio
• United States v. Smith
  426 F.2d 275· 6th Cir.· 1970-05-04 ·cited 12×
  The court held that completing blank money orders by inserting payee, amount, and sender constitutes a false making under 18 U.S.C. § 2314, and there was sufficient evidence of the defendant's knowledge.
• Thompson v. United States
  382 F.2d 390· 9th Cir.· 1967-07-26 ·cited 8×
  The court held that the discovery of marijuana was accidental and not the result of an unlawful search, making the subsequent arrest and seizure lawful. Even if the search were unlawful, the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt due to independent evidence of guilt.
• United States v. Hamilton
  455 F.2d 1268· 3d Cir.· 1972-02-14 ·cited 6×
  The court held that the appellant's claims of prosecutorial misconduct and improper admission of evidence did not constitute reversible error, and the judgment of the lower court was affirmed.