-
993 F.2d 451·
5th Cir.·
1993-06-04
·cited 2×
The court held that the grand jury had jurisdiction, the appellant's false testimony was material, and her Sixth Amendment right to counsel was not violated. The court also found no reversible error in the admission of hearsay testimony regarding threats.
-
929 F.2d 254·
6th Cir.·
1991-04-03
·cited 2×
The court held that statements made under penalty of perjury, even if unsworn, are covered by 18 U.S.C. § 1623, and that the prosecutor's remarks, while improper, did not constitute reversible error due to lack of objection and overwhelming evidence.
-
753 F.2d 660·
8th Cir.·
1985-01-24
·cited 2×
The court held that the jury instructions were adequate, the grand jury questions were sufficiently clear, the indictment stated an offense, the false statements were material, and there was sufficient evidence to support the conviction for making false declarations.
-
621 F.2d 62·
3d Cir.·
1980-04-28
·cited 2×
The court held that the jury instructions on intent, the scope of cross-examination of character witnesses, and the admission of evidence related to uncharged false testimony did not constitute reversible error.
-
977 F.2d 203·
6th Cir.·
1992-08-11
The court held that the district court did not err in calculating the defendant's sentence by applying the accessory after the fact provision and imposing consecutive sentences, as the defendant's perjury was in respect to a criminal offense and he need not have been convicted of
-
675 F.2d 772·
5th Cir.·
1982-05-14
The court held that the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction for making a false material declaration before a grand jury and that any prosecutorial misconduct was harmless error.