CITY CAB COMPANY OF ORLANDO, INC., PETITIONER,

v.

ROBERT G. WEBBER AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION, RESPONDENTS

Citator

Cited By

• State v. Cumbie, 380 So. 2d 1031 (Fla. 1980)
  …the District Court of Appeal, First District, in Cumbie v. State, 378 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978), is before us for review by petition for writ of certiorari because it conflicts with Clark v. State, 363 So. 2d 331 (Fla.1978), and Nevels v. State, 364 So. 2d 517 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978), cert. denied, 372 So. 2d 470 (Fla.1979). The issue in this case is: When the trial court sustains the defendant’s objection to an improper comment made by the prosecutor during closing argument and admonishes the jury to disrega…
• Houston v. State, 394 So. 2d 557 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)
  …lant contends the prosecutory’s highly prejudicial comments, made in his closing argument, were so improper as to deny him of his right to a fair trial. [*558] We affirm on the authority of Clark v. State, 363 So. 2d 331 (Fla.1978); Nevels v. State, 364 So. 2d 517 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978); State v. Cumbie, 380 So. 2d 1031 (Fla.1980); cf. Spenkelink v. State, 350 So. 2d 85 (Fla. 1977). Affirmed.…