OLGA HERNANDEZ GARCELL ET VIR., APPELLANTS,
v.
ARNOLD A. OPER, J. D., ETHICON, INC., ETC., ET AL., APPELLEES

Fla. 3d DCA | 1978-11-07
Nos. 77-2071, 77-2072
Before BARKDULL and HUBBART, JJ., and CHARLES CARROLL (Ret.), Associate Judge.
363 So. 2d 1168 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1978) Positive Treatment
Cited by 5 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Thompson v. Jacobs, 314 So. 2d 797 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975). See also Rice v. Walker, 359 So. 2d 891 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); Royal v. Black and Decker Manufacturing Co., 205 So. 2d 307 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • …ility or indemnity policy such as the one involved here. Since we hold that Mrs. Arevalo is the “contracting insured,” we need not decide whether she is also a “specifically named policy beneficiary.” But see Industrial Fire & Casualty Co. v. Jones, 363 So. 2d 1168, 1170 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978) (resident spouse a “named insured” though not designated by first and last names in policy). . As applied to a situation such as this, it is apparent that the language in Roberts upon which the carrier relies is dictum. The…
  • Sturgis v. Fortune Ins. Co., 475 So. 2d 1272 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985)
    …surance coverage. Additionally, a person described as a spouse of a policyholder may properly be included as a named insured even though the given name and surname of the spouse are not stated in the policy. Indus. Fire & Casualty Ins. Co. v. Jones, 363 So. 2d 1168 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978). An insurance company may include a policyholder’s “spouse” categorically instead of setting forth the actual spouse’s name for the simple reason that a policyholder is not apt to have the same spouse at any given point in time. C…
  • Lopez v. Fid. & Cas. Co. of N.Y., 384 So. 2d 680 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980)
    …insured under the policy or for injury sustained by any person operating the insured motor vehicle without the express or implied consent of the insured. While we held this exclusion valid in Industrial Fire and Casualty Insurance Company v. Jones, 363 So. 2d 1168 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978), it is not applicable in the present case because Rodriguez did not own the vehicle occupied by Lopez. Lopez also appeals from the denial of his motion for partial summary judgment in which he sought to have it determined that he…

Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw