NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLANT,
v.
SOUTHEAST FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF MIAMI, TOM W. CONELY, III, LANAE MCARTHUR, A MINOR AND NADEAN MCARTHUR HUFF, APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
National Life Insurance Company appealed the denial of its motion for attorneys' fees and costs after obtaining a successful interpleader action regarding a life insurance policy on a deceased insured whose wife (the beneficiary) was indicted for his murder. The court reversed and remanded, holding that the insurer was entitled to recover reasonable attorneys' fees and costs as an interpleader stakeholder.
An insurance company that admits liability, files an interpleader action with total disinterest in disbursement of proceeds (seeking only judicial determination of conflicting claims), and does not cause the conflicting claims is entitled to recover reasonable attorneys' fees and costs from the estate or settlement of the policy proceeds.
[1] An insurer is entitled to an award of attorneys' fees and costs when it files a complaint for interpleader to resolve conflicting claims to policy proceeds, provided the…
[2] An insurer may recover attorneys' fees and costs in an interpleader action even when the beneficiary is accused of murdering the insured.
Previewing 2 of 5 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“The appellant admitted liability under the double indemnity clause of the policy, filed a complaint for interpleader which was granted, had total disinterest in the disbursement of the policy proceeds other than the desire to have conflicting claims judicially determined, and did nothing to cause the conflicting claims; therefore, on the authority of Miller v. Gulf Life Ins. Co., 148 Fla. 1, 3 So.2d 519 (1941) and Ellison v. Riddle, 166 So.2d 840 (Fla.2d DCA 1964), the order denying attorneys' fees is hereby reversed and remanded to the trial court with directions for the entry of an award of attorneys' fees and costs, in a reasonable amount.”
This quote encapsulates the court's holding that an insurer acting as a disinterested interpleader stakeholder is entitled to recover reasonable attorneys' fees and costs.
Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceNational Life issued a $100,000 life insurance policy with $100,000 accidental death benefits on Charles M. McArthur in 1964, with his wife Nadean McA…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Accidental Death Benefits cases and more on FLexlaw
BLACK, SUSAN H., Associate Judge.
Appellant, National Life Insurance Company, takes its appeal from an interlocutory order denying a motion for attorneys’ fees and costs.
The record reflects that appellant issued a life insurance policy on the life of Charles M. McArthur on August 26, 1964, in the face amount of $100,000 with an additional $100,000 accidental death benefits provision. The appellee, Nadean McArthur, now Nade-an McArthur Huff, owned the policy and was the named beneficiary. The appellee was indicted for the June 10,1973, shooting of her husband, Charles M. McArthur, and to this date there has been no final disposition of the charges.
After the death of Mr. McArthur the appellee, through her attorneys, filed a claim for the benefits under the insurance policy. Whether the claim had been filed was disputed by the appellee, but in the original complaint for interpleader the appellant alleged the filing of the claim, which allegation was admitted in the answer of the appellee.
The appellant, knowing that a beneficiary who murders an insured may not take the proceeds under the insurance policy, filed a complaint for interpleader February 25, 1975, naming as defendants all those who might have a claim to the policy proceeds. All parties answered, with the Defendant-Southeast First National Bank of Miami filing a counter claim and cross claim, Defendant-Nadean McArthur Huff filing a counter claim and/or cross claim and the defendant/guardian of LaNae McArthur filing a cross claim.
The appellant filed a motion for partial summary judgment which was granted with the court ordering the appellant to deposit with the registry of the court the total sum of its liability under the life insurance policy in the amount of $216,800.12. The subsequent motion for determination of attorneys’ fees and costs and entry of a final judgment based thereon was denied, the order denying being the order from which this appeal is taken.
The appellant admitted liability under the double indemnity clause of the policy, filed a complaint for interpleader which was granted, had total disinterest in the disbursement of the policy proceeds other than the desire to have conflicting claims judicially determined, and did nothing to cause the conflicting claims; therefore, on the authority of Miller v. Gulf Life Ins. Co., 148 Fla. 1, 3 So. 2d 519 (1941) and Ellison v. Riddle, 166 So. 2d 840 (Fla.2d DCA 1964), the order denying attorneys’ fees is hereby reversed and remanded to the trial court with directions for the entry of an award of attorneys’ fees and costs, in a reasonable amount.
REVERSED AND REMANDED with directions.
DAUKSCH and LETTS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Jimani Corp. v. S.L.T. Warehouse Co., 409 So. 2d 496 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982)…(to be entitled to attorney fees in interpleader action, plaintiff must demonstrate total disinterest in stake he holds and that he did nothing to cause conflicting claims). Compare, National Life Insurance Company v. Southeast First National Bank, 361 So. 2d 432 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978) (totally disinterested insurers who did nothing to cause conflicting claims could recover fees in interpleader action). . 81 Am.Jur.2d, Witnesses 222 and cases cited therein.…
Authorities Cited
- Miller v. Gulf Life Ins. Co., 148 Fla. 1 (Fla. 1941)
- Ellison v. Riddle, 166 So. 2d 840 (Fla. 2d DCA 1964)