LISA GAIL APTAKER, M.D., M.P.H., APPELLANT,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The dissenting opinion argues that the trial court's actions regarding M.P.'s probation violations, including modifications and contempt proceedings, were procedurally complex and potentially flawed, particularly concerning the consolidation of allegations and the handling of show cause hearings.
The dissenting opinion does not state a holding but rather critiques the procedural handling of the case by the trial court and the majority's potential misinterpretation of the events.
M.P. was arrested for petit theft and drug possession, subsequently placed on probation with a curfew and school attendance requirement. After alleged…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
PER CURIAM.
Appellee’s motion to strike third amended initial brief is granted. As pro se appellant failed to respond to this court’s show cause order, this appeal is hereby dismissed. Appellant’s third amended initial brief still references materials stricken from a previously submitted appendix and does not contain a citation to the record for each and every asserted fact as directed by this court.
ALLEN, WEBSTER, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.