MARK T. INNERST ET UX., ET AL., APPELLANTS,

v.

DADE COUNTY, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Leiser v. State, 398 So. 2d 889 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981)
  …ant’s motion for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.850 is affirmed. However, the case is remanded for correction of the judgment and sentence to reflect the specific crime for which appellant was convicted. Williams v. State, 360 So. 2d 61 (Fla.2d DCA 1978); Griffen v. State, 384 So. 2d 324 (Fla.2d DCA 1980). Appellant need not be present for this purpose. McCORD, ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr. and ERVIN, JJ., concur.…
• Griffen v. State, 384 So. 2d 324 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980)
  …, the judgment and sentence does not indicate that a firearm was used. The judgment is affirmed, but the case is remanded for correction of the judgment and sentence to reflect the specific crime for which appellant was convicted. Williams v. State, 360 So. 2d 61 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978). GRIMES, C. J., and HOBSON and OTT, JJ., concur.…
• Cadayid v. State, 416 So. 2d 1156 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)
  …trom v. State, 388 So. 2d 1308 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980), but that the adjudication and the enhanced penalties, because of the possession of a firearm, were appropriate as to count II, Griffen v. State, 384 So. 2d 324 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980); Williams v. State, 360 So. 2d 61 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978), but, as to Count III, inappropriate. Fowler v. State, 375 So. 2d 879 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979); Crook v. State, 385 So. 2d 1136 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980). Therefore, for the reasons above stated, all the convictions and adjudications are aff…

Authorities Cited

• Rashard v. Cappiali, 171 So. 2d 581 (Fla. 3d DCA 1965)
• Warriner v. Ferraro, 177 So. 2d 723 (Fla. 3d DCA 1965)
• S. Bell Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Fasce, 348 So. 2d 1196 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977)
• Neida's Boutique, Inc. v. Gabor & Co., 348 So. 2d 1196 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977)