UNITED STATES FIDELITY & GUARANTY COMPANY, A CORPORATION, INDIVIDUALLY AND FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF KENNETH TRESSLER AND KENNETH TRESSLER,

v.

ADA A. TRESSLER, SHRIVER B. TRESSLER AND RUTH WESTERBERG, AS RECEIVER

Citator

Cited By (22 total)

• State v. Anderson, 537 So. 2d 1373 (Fla. 1989)
  …erway. Respondent was tried and found guilty of violating section 810.02(1), (3) and sentenced to four and one-half years in prison. The district court reversed, relying on Wilcox v. State, 248 So. 2d 692 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971), and Alvarez v. State, 157 Fla. 254, 25 So. 2d 661 (1946). The court reasoned that the filing of the amended information superseded the original information; therefore, when the state subsequently withdrew the amended information, no viable charging instrument remained. Article I, sec…
• Lacros v. State, 339 So. 2d 217 (Fla. 1976)
  …as permitted to amend, and the petitioner was subsequently convicted. In an opinfeh reported at 326 So. 2d 220, the Second District Court of Appeal affirmed the action taken by the trial court. Because of conflict in decision with Alvarez v. State, 157 Fla. 254, 25 So. 2d 661 (1946), and Sipos v. State, 90 So. 2d 113 (Fla.1956), we issued our order allowing certiorari and dispensing with oral argument. After studying the briefs submitted by the parties, we have concluded that the District Court of Appeal r…
• Lawson v. State, 251 So. 2d 683 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971)
  …tion should have been re-filed with a new arraignment for the defendants, etc. See: Suarez v. State, 95 Fla. 42, 115 So. 519; Fekany v. State, 111 Fla. 598, 149 So. 590; State ex rel. Wentworth v. Coleman, 121 Fla. 13, 163 So. 316; Alvarez v. State, 157 Fla. 254, 25 So. 2d 661; compare Johnson v. State, Fla.App.1966, 190 So. 2d 811. Therefore, we find that the trial judge committed error in permitting the amendment and requiring the defendants to go forward immediately with the trial, As to the sufficienc…