JOHN CARMEN ANDERSON, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
HUBBART, Judge
(dissenting).
I must respectfully dissent. In my view, the appellant herein has met all the necessary prerequisites to seal from public view the court and police records relating to consolidated case # 73-5869 in the Circuit Court for the Eleventh Judicial Circuit of Florida under Section 901.33, Florida Statutes (1977), as interpreted in Johnson v. State, 336 So. 2d 93 (Fla.1976), and implemented by Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.692. No valid reason has been advanced either in the trial court or this court for denying the appellant’s motion to so seal such records. The order appealed from which denies such motion should therefore be reversed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Hollywood, Inc. v. Broward Cnty., 431 So. 2d 606 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983)…ar ordinance under review was defective because it failed to include sufficient restrictions on the use of the money collected. The ordinance was later amended and upheld. See City of Dunedin v. Contractors & Builders Association of Pinellas County, 358 So. 2d 846 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978), cert. denied, 370 So. 2d 458 (Fla.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 867, 100 S.Ct. 140, 62 L.Ed.2d 91 (1979). . This test was espoused, at least in part, in Jordan v. Village of Menomonee Falls, 28 Wis.2d 608, 137 N.W. 2d 442 (1965)…
-
City OF Tarpon Springs v. Tarpon Springs Arcade Ltd., 585 So. 2d 324 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991)…is affirmed. See City of Dunedin v. Contractors and Builders Ass’n of Pinellas County, 312 So. 2d 763 (Fla.2d DCA 1975), reversed and remanded, 329 So. 2d 314 (Fla.1976), on remand, 330 So. 2d 744 (Fla.2d DCA 1976), app. after remand to trial court, 358 So. 2d 846 (Fla.2d DCA 1978), cert. denied, 370 So. 2d 458 (Fla.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 867, 100 S.Ct. 140, 62 L.Ed.2d 91 (1979); St. Johns County, Florida v. N.E. Florida Builder’s Ass’n, Inc., 583 So. 2d 635 (Fla.1991). Appellant adopted ordinance 90-…
-
Town OF Longboat KEY v. Lands END, Ltd., 433 So. 2d 574 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983)…inance was enacted after the instant suit was filed but before final hearing in this matter, and it should have been considered as the operative ordinance when the trial judge made his decision. City of Dunedin v. Contractors & Builders Association, 358 So. 2d 846 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978). Furthermore, Heinzman v. U.S. Home of Florida, 317 So. 2d 838 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975), is distinguishable from the instant case. There, the court did not apply an ordinance passed after a contract for sanitary sewer service was enter…
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Johnson v. State, 336 So. 2d 93 (Fla. 1976)