THE CITY OF ST. PETERSBURG BEACH, ETC., ET AL., PETITIONERS,

v.

MARINE ATTRACTIONS, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, RESPONDENT

Citator

Cited By

• Carson v. State, 489 So. 2d 1236 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986)
  …We find, however, that rule 3.800 has no application to this ease, because the trial court was neither correcting an illegal sentence nor reducing a legal sentence, but was attempting to execute the original sentence it had ordered. Perry v. State, 357 So. 2d 425 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978). A court may correct clerical mistakes in its own judgments and records, nunc pro tunc, even after the term of court has expired, and such corrections generally relate back and take effect as of the date of judgment. Boggs v. Wain…
• Buckbee v. State, 378 So. 2d 39 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)
  …imposed subsequent to sentencing, but rather one in which the records of the court were properly corrected nunc pro tunc so as to reflect what everyone knew had in fact taken place. See Boggs v. Wainwright, 223 So. 2d 316 (Fla.1969); Perry v. State, 357 So. 2d 425 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978), cert. denied, 364 So. 2d 889 (Fla.1978). The fact of the matter is that if Buckbee or his lawyer had objected at the hearing to the trial judge’s proposal, the court could and almost certainly would have sentenced him either at…
• Taylor v. State, 436 So. 2d 124 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)
  …s claim that the written order revoking probation mistakenly identified Peletier as the victim is hardly a basis for reversal. That order can simply be corrected on remand. Boggs v. Wainwright, 223 So. 2d 316 (Fla.1969); Perry v. State ex rel Mills, 357 So. 2d 425 (Fla. 3d [*128] DCA 1978); Luhrs v. State, 394 So. 2d 137 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981). Accordingly, we affirm the order revoking the defendant’s probation and remand the case to the trial court with directions to correct the order to reflect the names of t…

Authorities Cited

• Santini Bros., Inc. v. Grover, 338 So. 2d 79 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976)
• Wright v. Sterling Drugs, Inc., 287 So. 2d 376 (Fla. 2d DCA 1973)