THE FOUNTAINS OF PALM BEACH CONDOMINIUM, INC. NO. 5, A FLORIDA CORPORATION NOT FOR PROFIT, APPELLANT,
v.
CAROLYN FARKAS, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 1978-02-14
No. 77-1002
DOWNEY and LETTS, JJ., concur.
355 So. 2d 163 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1978) Caution
Cited by 16 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

A condominium association appeals from a judgment dismissing its complaint seeking to enjoin a unit owner from maintaining a patio built on common elements without prior written consent. The court reverses, holding that the owner's failure to obtain required written consent from management and the association cannot be excused by estoppel or waiver based on their failure to object.


Holding

The court holds that the owner's failure to obtain required written consent cannot be excused by estoppel or waiver. The board's statement that it lacked legal authority to grant permission was not a form of assent or tacit approval, and the management firm's noncommittal attitude did not justify the owner's belief that she could ignore the Declaration's requirement for prior written consent.


Headnotes

[1] A condominium association may bring an action for damages or injunctive relief against a unit owner for noncompliance with the declaration of condominium, governing docum…

[2] Unit owners are prohibited from making alterations or additions to common elements without the prior written consent of the management firm and the association.

Previewing 2 of 6 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“Declarations of Condominium ought to be construed strictly.”

Establishes the standard for interpreting condominium governing documents, supporting strict enforcement of the written consent requirement.

Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

A unit owner's husband sought permission to build a patio on the condominium's common elements. He first consulted the management firm, which suggeste…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
ALDERMAN, Chief Judge.

ALDERMAN, Chief Judge.

The plaintiff condominium association appeals from a final judgment denying its prayer for injunctive relief and dismissing its complaint against a unit owner who built a patio on the condominium’s common elements. We reverse.

The defendant owner’s husband testified that he attempted to obtain permission for the construction of a patio on the common elements. He went first to the management firm, where he was told that while the firm had no objections to the proposal, a transition was underway in which the condominium association was taking over, so that he should raise the matter at an association meeting. He attended a meeting of the board of directors of the condominium association. The board informed him that they had no legal status and were therefore unable to grant or deny permission. The owner went ahead with construction, after which the condominium association brought this action for a mandatory injunction requiring the removal of the patio slab from the condominium elements at the owner’s expense. Section 718.303(1), Florida Statutes (Supp.1976), mandates that unit owners shall be governed by the declaration of condominium, the documents creating the condominium association, and the association bylaws. The same statutory section authorizes a condominium association to bring an action for damages or for injunctive relief against a unit owner for noncompliance. In the present case the unit owner was governed by the following provisions of the Declaration of Condominium:

IV. OWNERSHIP OF COMMON ELEMENTS

Each of the unit owners of the Condominium shall own an undivided interest in the common elements. .

XIV. MAINTENANCE AND ALTERATIONS

C. Each unit owner agrees as follows:

2. Not to make or cause to be made any structural addition or alteration to his unit or to the limited common elements or common elements.

3. To make no alterations, decoration, repair, replacement or change of the common elements . . . without the pri-or written consent of the Management Firm and the Association. .

D. In the event the owner of a unit fails to maintain the said unit and limited common elements, as required herein, or makes any alterations or additions without the required written consent, or otherwise violates . . . the provisions hereof, the Association, or the Management Firm on behalf of the Association, and on its own behalf, shall have the right to proceed in a Court of equity for an injunction to seek compliance with the provisions hereof .

This court has previously held that Declarations of Condominium ought to be construed strictly. Sterling Village Condominium, Inc. v. Breitenbach, 251 So. 2d 685, 688 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971). It is undisputed that the unit owner in the case now before us failed to get prior written consent from the management firm and the association, as required by the Declaration of Condominium, before altering the common elements. The owner argues that the failure of the management firm and the association to object to her intentions should operate as an estoppel or as a waiver of the association’s right to complain now that the patio slab has been laid. We disagree. The statement by the board of directors that it had no legal authority to give its permission was not a form of assent, nor even an intimation of tacit approval. Neither can the noncommittal, though apparently rather favorable, attitude of the management firm be said to have justified any belief by the owner that she could safely ignore the requirement of the Declaration of Condominium that she obtain the prior written consent of both management and the association before altering the common elements.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

DOWNEY and LETTS, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Pelican Island Prop. Owners Ass'n, Inc. v. Murphy, 554 So. 2d 1179 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989)
    …rida courts refuse to apply estoppel principles to permit alterations of condominium property without written permission of the association as required by the Declaration of Condominium). In Fountains of Palm Beach Condominium, Inc. No. 5 v. Farkas, 355 So. 2d 163 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978), the failure of the condominium association to object to the unit owner’s intent to alter property did not operate as an estoppel or waiver. In Fountains, the unit owner’s numerous attempts to obtain permission prior to construct…
  • Schmidt v. Sherrill, 442 So. 2d 963 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983)
    …n. We reversed, holding that the term “substantial alteration” had to be understood by its plain meaning. Also, we held that declarations of condominium must be strictly construed. See also Fountains of Palm [*966] Beach Condominium, Inc. v. Farkas, 355 So. 2d 163 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978). In the case at bar there can be no question but that the alterations are substantial. Consequently, they could be made only after full compliance with the declaration of condominium. The trial court declined to issue a mandator…
  • Brickell BAY Club Condo. Ass'n, Inc. v. Hernstadt, 512 So. 2d 994 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)
    …rcumscribing the extent and limits of the enjoyment and use of real property- A Declaration of Condominium is strictly construed to preclude any use not explicitly authorized by the Declaration. Fountains of Palm Beach Condo., Inc. No. 5 v. Farkas, 355 So. 2d 163 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978). A starting point in this review of the law of waiver and estoppel is the authorities which hold that the estoppel principle generally has no application to transactions which are forbidden by statute or ordinance or which are c…

Previewing 3 of 8 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw