IN RE THE GUARDIANSHIP OF WILLIAM CHARLES THOMAS. HERITAGE FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION AND FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF NEW SMYRNA BEACH, APPELLANTS,
v.
WILLIAM CHARLES THOMAS, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
Based upon the record on appeal, the briefs and oral argument and the points as framed and recited in the briefs, and without addressing ourselves to the procedures employed in the trial court or here nor any other potential issues not articulated in the points on appeal, the judgment here appealed is affirmed except insofar as it purports to award attorney’s fees, for which we find no basis in contract or law. Our decision here is not intended to foreclose future consideration in the trial court of the cross-claim and third party claim which do not appear to have been adjudicated by the judgment here appealed and are not mentioned therein.
Affirmed in part and reversed in part and remanded for further proceedings in accordance with law.
McCORD, C. J., and BOYER and MELVIN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Briarwood Cap. v. Lennar Corp., 125 So. 3d 291 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013)…’ jurisdictional argument in this case. See Mang v. Country Comfort Inn, Inc., 559 So. 2d 672, 673 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990) (concluding count not adjudicated in trial court’s order remains for disposition by the trial court); In re Guardianship of Thomas, 353 So. 2d 666, 666 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978) (affirming judgment and holding that crossclaim and third-party claim not mentioned in or adjudicated by judgment on appeal could be considered by the trial court). Finally, it is plain the position articulated by the Marsc…