W. S., A JUVENILE, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1977-12-13
No. 77-378
Before PEARSON and NATHAN, JJ., and CHARLES CARROLL, (Ret.), Associate Judge.
353 So. 2d 181 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1977) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

W. S., a juvenile, was charged by petition for delinquency with robbery. He takes this appeal from an order adjudicating him delinquent and committing him to the Division of Youth Services. The sole question presented is whether the charge of robbery was established by substantial competent evidence.

We agree with the appellant that there was not substantial competent evidence to support a finding of robbery. However, the record does support a finding that W. S. was guilty of larceny. Therefore, we affirm the adjudication of delinquency, and remand the cause to the juvenile court for modification of the order consistent with this opinion.

Affirmed and remanded.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • A.C. v. State, 479 So. 2d 297 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)
    …remaining four counts are not challenged herein and any one or all would be sufficient to sustain the order appealed. See J.B. v. State, 405 So. 2d 247 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); In the Interest of I.D.K., 360 So. 2d 488 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978); W.S. v. State, 353 So. 2d 181 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977). Therefore the adjudication of delinquency is affirmed. Affirmed.…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw