RICHARD L. LITT, M.D., PETITIONER,
v.
DOROTHY BETSEY AND JOSEPH BETSEY, HER HUSBAND, RESPONDENTS; RICHARD L. LITT, M.D., APPELLANT, V. DOROTHY BETSEY AND JOSEPH BETSEY, HER HUSBAND, APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court affirmed the interlocutory orders and denied the petitions for writ of certiorari.
Multiple parties filed petitions for writ of certiorari and interlocutory appeals concerning two distinct orders: one setting aside a dismissal and an…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Motion To Dismiss For Lack Of Prosecution cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
There have been filed between these parties two petitions for writ of certiorari and two interlocutory appeals. The various orders addressed are as follows:
Case No. 77-817 — Petition for Writ of Common Law Certiorari or in the Alternative Suggestion for Writ of Prohibition-taken from a March 18, 1977, order granting respondents’ (appellees’) motion to set aside order of dismissal.
Case No. 77-818 — Petition for Writ of Common Law Certiorari or in the Alternative Suggestion for Writ of Prohibition — taken from an April 12, 1977, order denying petitioner’s (appellant’s) motion to dismiss for lack of prosecution (which had been previously granted).
Case No. 77-824 — Notice of Interlocutory Appeal — taken from the March 18, 1977, order. Case No. 77-825 — Notice of Interlocutory Appeal — taken from the April 12, 1977, order. These matters are consolidated for briefing and oral argument. Having examined the briefs and heard argument, the following actions are taken:
The interlocutory orders, case nos. 77-824 and 77-825, are affirmed.
The petitions for writ of certiorari, case nos. 77-817 and 77-818, are denied.