STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER,
v.
SAMUEL LEE BRITTON, RESPONDENT
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Conflict Certiorari cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
We have for review by certiorari a decision of the District Court of Appeal, First District, Britton v. State, 339 So. 2d 256, which allegedly conflicts with the decision of the District Court of Appeal, Second District, in Lomax v. State, 322 So. 2d 650.
Subsequent to the filing of this petition for certiorari, we quashed the decision of the District Court of Appeal, Second Dis trict, in Lomax v. State, supra. See Lomax v. State, 345 So. 2d 719 (Fla.1977).
We approve the decision of the District Court of Appeal, First District, in the case sub judice. The writ of certiorari is therefore discharged.
It is so ordered.
ADKINS, BOYD, SUNDBERG and HATCHETT, JJ., concur. OVERTON, C. J., dissents.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Lomax v. State, 345 So. 2d 719 (Fla. 1977)
- Lomax v. State, 322 So. 2d 650 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975)
- Boggan R. Wright v. Ouida Wright, 339 So. 2d 256 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976)
- Britton v. State, 339 So. 2d 256 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976)