TAMIAMI ABSTRACT AND TITLE COMPANY, A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
v.
FERNANDO RAVELO AND YOLANDA GULTASCA RAVELO, HIS WIFE, APPELLEES

Fla. 3d DCA | 1977-08-30
No. 76-1616
Before HENDRY, C. J., and PEARSON and BARKDULL, JJ.
349 So. 2d 758 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1977) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Tampa & Jacksonville Railway Company v. Catts, 79 Fla. 235, 85 So. 364 (1920); Scheuer v. Balik, 130 Fla. 255, 177 So. 731 (1937); Shaw v. Hamm, 133 Fla. 722, 183 So. 19 (1938); Matousek v. Cooper, 111 So. 2d 65 (Fla.2nd D.C.A.1959); Horowitz v. United National Corporation, 324 So. 2d 189 (Fla.3rd D.C.A.1975).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Jackson v. Leon Cnty. Elections Canvassing Bd., 204 So. 3d 571 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016)
    …. See Allstate Ins. v. Boecher, 733 So. 2d 993, 995 (Fla.1999) (holding the primary purpose of discovery is to prevent the use of legal gymnastics and to prevent trials from being carried on in the dark); 955 N.E. 125th St. Corp. v. Cty. Nat’l Bank, 349 So. 2d 758, 760-61 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977) [*579] (holding due process of law requires an adequate opportunity for discovery). Finally, the trial court abused its discretion and violated Jackson’s due process rights by failing to address several pre-trial motions…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw