EDWARD LEE DUNCAN, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
EDWARD LEE DUNCAN, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
349 So. 2d 723
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1977)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of the record and briefs of the respective parties, we determine the trial court erred in failing to recite in the order of contempt facts constituting the contempt upon which appellant was found and adjudicated guilty. Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.830. We find no merit to appellant’s remaining contention. Accordingly, the order of contempt is vacated and set aside and the cause remanded for entry of a proper order of contempt consistent with the views herein expressed.
Order vacated and set aside and remanded with direction.
ALDERMAN, C. J., and CROSS and DOWNEY, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Holden v. State, 380 So. 2d 548 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980)…da is clear; compliance with the procedural safeguards contained in Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.830 is mandatory. Keezel v. State, 358 So. 2d 247 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978); Ray v. State, 352 So. 2d 110 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977); [*550] Duncan v. State, 349 So. 2d 723 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977); Ledlow v. State, 346 So. 2d 609 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977). Based on the court’s failure to comply with these procedures, we reverse the judgments and sentences and remand to allow Green and Holden a hearing so as to conform with Rule…