T. C. (TED) WARD, APPELLANT,
v.
CHARLES L. GIBSON, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Service of process upon a defendant's roommate at the defendant's leased parking space is not valid service at the defendant's usual place of abode.
Plaintiff sued defendant for damages. A special process server attempted to serve the defendant by leaving the summons and complaint with the defendan…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Insufficiency Of Service Of Process cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
This is an interlocutory appeal by the defendant, T. C. (Ted) Ward, from an order denying his motion to dismiss for insufficient process and insufficient service of process.
Charles L. Gibson, plaintiff, filed a verified complaint against Ward seeking compensatory and punitive damages allegedly owed pursuant to an oral contract. The summons directed that it be served together with a copy of the complaint, on T. C. (Ted) Ward at an address and apartment number in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, or on Allyn Gibson at the same address. When the Sheriff of Broward County was unable to serve Ward, a special process server was appointed by the court. The process server served one Allyn Gibson, Ward’s roommate, at Allyn Gibson’s leased parking space in the garage of the large hi-rise condominium apartment complex where Allyn Gibson and Ward reside. Ward filed a motion to dismiss on the ground of lack of jurisdiction because of insufficient process and service of process. The motion was denied.
Ward’s point on appeal is that service upon one other than the defendant at a place other than the defendant’s usual place of abode is not valid service on the defendant. Section 48.031, Fla.Stat., provides that,
“Service or original process is made by delivering a copy of it to the person to be served with a copy of the complaint . or by leaving the copies at his usual place of abode with some person of the family who is 15 years of age or older and informing the person of their contents . . . ”
In our opinion, under the facts presented in this case, service was not made at the defendant’s “usual place of abode” as required by § 48.031, supra. Accordingly, the order denying the motion to dismiss is reversed.
Reversed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Rokeach v. Glickstein, 718 So. 2d 831 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998)…ith the majority in its affirmance of the trial court’s order denying Melvin Rokeach’s motion to vacate default and for relief from final judgment. I would reverse and quash the service of process on Susan Rokeach on the authority of Ward v. Gibson, 349 So. 2d 173 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976). In my view, the majority has failed to distinguish the facts in Ward from those relied upon as the basis for service of process on Mrs. Rok-each.…1 / 2