MRS. KATIE CROW SMITH ET AL.
v.
UNION PARISH SCHOOL BOARD
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Mrs. Katie Crow Smith sued Union Parish School Board to recover $2,100 in alleged wages under an oral employment contract as a school teacher for 1948-1949, claiming she was wrongfully discharged without a hearing. The Florida Supreme Court affirmed the dismissal, holding that Smith was not a qualified teacher under Louisiana's Teachers' Tenure Act because her teaching certificates were expired or otherwise insufficient.
Mrs. Smith was not a qualified teacher within the meaning of the Teachers' Tenure Act because her teaching certificates did not meet statutory requirements. Therefore, she could not legally be hired as a teacher by the School Board, nor could she be paid for services as a teacher, and the Board's dismissal was proper.
“Mrs. Smith was qualified as a permanent teacher, and could not be discharged, after having been hired, without a hearing”
Appellants' central argument that Smith had permanent teacher status and statutory discharge protections, which the court rejected.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceMrs. Katie Crow Smith was hired orally by Union Parish School Board as a school teacher for the 1948-1949 school year. The Board dispensed with her se…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Teacher Certification Requirements cases and more on FLexlaw
FOURNET, Chief Justice.
Mrs. Katie Crow Smith instituted suit against the Union Parish School Board, in which suit she was joined by her husband, E. F. Smith, to recover $2,100, claimed to be due her under an oral contract of employment as a school teacher in the public schools of that Parish for the school year 1948-1949, the Board having dispensed with her services without a hearing; they are appealing from the judgment of the lower court dismissing the suit on defendant’s exceptions of no cause or right of action.
The argument of appellants’ counsel that the trial judge erroneously maintained the exceptions and dismissed the plaintiffs’ suit because, according to the allegations of the petition,1 “ * * * Mrs. Smith was qualified as a permanent teacher, and could not be discharged, after having been hired, without a hearing, * * * ” is untenable in the light of the fact that Mrs. Smith, in answer to defendant’s prayer for oyer, produced two certificates, one dated September 1, 1914, valid for five years, the other a Type “T” Trade Certificate, valid for the school year 1947 — 1948—clearly showing that she is not a “teacher” within the meaning of the Teachers’ Tenure Act2 and therefore could not legally be hired as a teacher by the School Board3 nor be paid for her services as a teacher.4 See State ex rel. Sibley v. Ascension Parish School Board, 222 La. 923, 64 So. 2d 221.
For the reasons assigned, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.
. In disposing of an exception of no cause or right of action, all well-pleaded facts must be accepted as true.
. “ * * * the word ‘teacher’ means any employee of any parish or city school board who holds a teacher’s certificate and whose legal employment requires such teacher’s certificate.” LSA-R.S. 17:441.
. “ * * * Every teacher shall hold a certificate of a grade sufficiently high to meet the requirements of his position. * * *” LSA-R.S. 17:413.
.“Before receiving any remuneration for services rendered, every teacher of any school supported wholly or in part with public funds must have been fully qualified to teach in the public schools of Louisiana * * LSA-R.S. 17:414.