JACKSONVILLE COACH COMPANY, A CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
v.
GENEVA DUPREE AND ERNEST DUPREE, HER HUSBAND, APPELLEES
JACKSONVILLE COACH COMPANY, A CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
GENEVA DUPREE AND ERNEST DUPREE, HER HUSBAND, APPELLEES
82 So. 2d 745
Florida Supreme Court (1955)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
This cause came on to be heard upo-n the motion of appellees to affirm the order appealed from pursuant to Rule 38 of the Rules of this Court, 30 F.S.A., and it appearing’to the Court from an examination of the record that said petition is appropriate and seasonably made and that it is manifest that the questions raised on appeal are without substantial merit and need no further-argument; It is accordingly ordered, adjudged and decreed that the motion to affirm the order appealed from be and the same is hereby granted, and the order is
Affirmed.
THOMAS, Acting C. J., and HOBSON, THORNAL and BUFORD, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
August M. Carmazi and Lester M. Muhn v. Bd. OF Cnty. Comm'rs OF Dade Cnty., 108 So. 2d 318 (Fla. 3d DCA 1959)…Supreme Court affirmed the chancellor’s ruling that the new fill restricted the owner’s right to navigate in the main body of the lake and declared that such right could not be denied as it was a “practical incident of his riparian proprietorship.” [82 So. 2d 745] We have carefully considered the Webb case and admittedly the facts are very-similar to those presented in the instant case. At first blush it would seem that the court appeared to expand the right of ingress and egress as previously stated in the…