ESTEBAN VENTURA, APPELLANT,
v.
SERAFINA FREYRE VENTURA AND ROSARIO VENTURA, APPELLEES
ESTEBAN VENTURA, APPELLANT,
SERAFINA FREYRE VENTURA AND ROSARIO VENTURA, APPELLEES
347 So. 2d 777
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1977)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We are asked to reverse an award of lump sum alimony, permanent alimony and attorney’s fees to the wife upon the ground that these awards were an abuse of discretion. Our review of the record in the light of the briefs and the oral argument shows that these awards are within the discretion of the trial judge as set forth in Shaw v. Shaw, 334 So. 2d 13 (Fla.1976); and Herzog v. Herzog, 346 So. 2d 56 (Fla.1977).
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Loeb v. State, 387 So. 2d 433 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980)…flaunt the authority of the court with impunity. We have previously held that a trial court does not have jurisdiction, pending appeal of an order which has been stayed, to conduct a probation revocation hearing. State ex rel. Brenner v. Dubitsky, 347 So. 2d 777 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977). Conversely, we have held the trial court does have jurisdiction to conduct a revocation hearing on an order of probation which has been appealed but not stayed pending review. Bush v. State, 369 So. 2d 674 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979). Bus…
-
State of Fla. ex rel. Teodula Paz Salomon & Ramon Salomon v. Sandstrom, 349 So. 2d 696 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977)…te ex rel. Hall v. Lewis, 88 Fla. 146, 101 So. 199 (1924), or to modify a finding of guilt, McCormick v. State, 153 Fla. 838, 16 So. 2d 49 (1943), or to revoke or alter a sentence such as an order of probation. See State ex rel. Brenner v. Dubitsky, 347 So. 2d 777 (Fla.3d DCA 1977). The circuit court had no jurisdiction in the instant case to modify the original five year probation order because a notice of appeal from the judgment of conviction and sentence had been perfected and was presently pending befor…
-
Bush v. State, 369 So. 2d 674 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)…ad probable cause to believe that the packets contained cannabis (marijuana) and a narcotics sale was in progress.” Citing our decisions in State ex rel. Salomon v. Sandstrom, 349 So. 2d 696 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977) and State ex rel. Brenner v. Dubitsky, 347 So. 2d 777 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977), Bush also contends that the trial judge had no jurisdiction to revoke his probation for the battery charge while that ease was on appeal. We do not agree.2 The Brenner case holds only that the lower court may not adjudicate a vio…
Authorities Cited
- Shaw v. Shaw, 334 So. 2d 13 (Fla. 1976)
- Herzog v. Herzog, 346 So. 2d 56 (Fla. 1977)