JOHN F. BELL, APPELLANT,
v.
ROXIE P. BELL, APPELLEE
JOHN F. BELL, APPELLANT,
ROXIE P. BELL, APPELLEE
81 So. 2d 526
Florida Supreme Court (1955)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
This appeal is palpably frivolous. Consequently, it is hereby dismissed ex mero motu.
DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, HOBSON and THORNAL, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Hemmerle v. City OF Wilton Manors, 251 So. 2d 146 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971)…rule did apply, it would be immaterial because an appellate court has the express power under Rule 6.13, FAR, as well as the inherent power to dismiss an appeal on its own motion where the same is not properly prosecuted. See Bell v. Bell, Fla.1955, 81 So. 2d 526 and Prevatt v. Link, Fla.App.1958, 107 So. 2d 37. Indulging the presumption of correctness in favor of the ruling of the circuit court, we assume that the basis for the dismissal by that court of the petitioner’s appeal was the failure of the petit…