G & J INVESTMENT CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
v.
LOPEZ STONE OF NORTHEAST FLORIDA, INC., ETC., ET AL., APPELLEES
PER CURIAM.
We have examined the briefs and record on this appeal and find no reversible error with one exception. The exception is contained in ordering paragraph A of the final judgment which states as follows:
“Plaintiff, Lopez Stone of Northeast Florida, Inc., shall have and recover $2,800.00 from defendant, Camelot Mobile Home Estates, Inc., and third-party defendant. G & J Investment Corporation. for which $2,800.00 let execution issue.” (Emphasis supplied.)
It was error to include the foregoing underlined portion in the judgment. Third-party defendant, G & J Investment Corporation, is not a party to the action between plaintiff-appellee, Lopez Stone of Northeast Florida, Inc., and defendant-appellee Camelot Mobile Home Estates, Inc. In other respects the record reveals competent substantial evidence to support the findings and rulings of the trial court which are questioned on this appeal.
Affirmed in part and reversed in part and remanded for correction of the final judgment pursuant to this opinion.
RAWLS, Acting C. J., and McCORD and SMITH, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
LEE v. State, 501 So. 2d 591 (Fla. 1987)…binds only the state attorney’s office or whether it also precludes other state agents, such as state law enforcement officers, from making sentencing recommendations contrary to the terms of the agreements. Relying on its decision in Wood v. State, 346 So. 2d 143 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977), the district court below held that only the state attorney is bound by such agreements. In Wood, 346 So. 2d 143, the defendant had entered a plea of nolo contendere to a charge of possession of marijuana in return for the state’…1 / 3
-
LEE v. State, 490 So. 2d 80 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986)…ges the state breached the plea agreement because in the Presentence Investigation report, FDLE Agent Collins recommended incarceration although the plea agreement provided that the state would recommend probation. The state relies on Wood v. State, 346 So. 2d 143 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977), to support its contention that Agent Collins’ comments did not constitute a violation of the plea agreement on the part of the state, since tha assistant state attorney, and not Agent Collins, was the spokesman for the state. In…1 / 3
-
Adler v. State, 382 So. 2d 1298 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980)…ficer regarding the length of the defendant’s sentence did not vitiate its bargain because the trial court was not bound by any such recommendation and the defendant clearly understood it. State v. Adams, 342 So. 2d 818 (Fla.1977) and Wood v. State, 346 So. 2d 143 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977). Singularly and collectively, it is apparent that no good cause was demonstrated to the trial, court sufficient to vacate the guilty plea prior to imposition of sentence. Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.170(f) and State v. Braverman, supra. N…