IN THE INTEREST OF A. L. D., A CHILD
IN THE INTEREST OF A. L. D., A CHILD
345 So. 2d 339
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1976)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
This court sua sponte finds that the order on the discovery motion appears to be a nonappealable interlocutory order. Considering the petition as one for review by common law certiorari, the petition should be, and it is hereby, denied as we find no departure from the essential requirements of law.
McNULTY, C. J., and BOARDMAN and GRIMES, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Sullivan v. Sullivan, 363 So. 2d 393 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978)…as all personal property.” We must agree with her that the trial court could not order the division of “all personal property,” because there was no prayer for such relief in the pleadings and the issue was not tried by consent. Harrell v. Harrell, 345 So. 2d 339 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977); Doane v. Doane, 330 So. 2d 753 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976). The ordered division of the “furniture, furnishings and fixtures,” though sought by the pleadings, suffers from the same infirmity as the ordered sale of the marital home; i. e.,…