WAKEMAN GRIFFIN GRIBBEL, JOHN BANCKER GRIBBEL, IDELLA GRIBBEL MCCURDEY, ELIZABETH GRIBBEL CORKRAN AND THE REAL ESTATE TRUST COMPANY OF PHILADELPHIA, AS EXECUTORS AND TRUSTEES UNDER THE LAST WILL AND TESTAMENT OF JOHN GRIBBEL, DECEASED; WAKEMAN GRIFFIN GRIBBEL, JOHN BANCKER GRIBBEL, IDELLA GRIBBEL MCCURDY, ELIZABETH GRIBBEL CORKRAN AND THOMAS A. GRACKEN, JR., AS DIRECTOR-TRUSTEES OF JOHN GRIBBEL, INCORPORATED, A DISSOLVED FLORIDA CORPORATION; JOHN GRIBBEL INCORPORATED, A DISSOLVED FLORIDA CORPORATION; THE TAMPA GAS COMPANY, A FLORIDA CORPORATION,

v.

T. N. HENDERSON, JR., R. R. DUKE, O. G. DUKE, GENEVIEVE M. BALL, MARY POULOS MATHESON AND ALL PERSONS, FIRMS, AND CORPORATIONS HAVING THE SAME GENERAL INTEREST IN THE TAMPA GAS COMPANY, A FLORIDA COR PORATION, BY VIRTUE OF BEING OWNERS AND HOLDERS OF PREFERRED STOCK THEREIN, AND AMY A. BOOSER, MARY E. POST, E. S. MACKENZIE, MANUEL COUTO, JR., AVIS A. HENDERSON, WINNIFRED F. H. TAVEAU, LILLIAN GWIN, MARY A. MARCHAND, S. H. KANTOR; AND ERNEST BERGER AND RILEY J. MCMASTER, AS EXECUTORS OF THE LAST WILL AND TESTAMENT AND CODICIL ATTACHED THERETO OF LETITIA V. GRAHAM, DECEASED

Citator

Cited By

• Rupp v. Bryant, 417 So. 2d 658 (Fla. 1982)
  …iction, that public officers are generally liable for their torts arising from imperative or ministerial duties. The conclusion in Loucks is thus misguided. Rupp and Stasco further rely on State Board of Administration v. Pasco County, 156 Fla. 37, 22 So. 2d 387 (1945),15 but that case involved no claim of negligence or fraud on the part of the county official. They turn finally to Smith v. Bolte, 172 So. 2d 624 (Fla. 2d DCA 1965).16 Once again a perspicacious reading of the case reveals that it is consiste…
• Fossey v. Dade Cnty., 16 Fla. Supp. 20 (Dade Cty. Cir. Ct. 1960)
  …not be large; it will debar him from sitting in the cause no matter how small or trifling it may be; the court will not inquire into the effect it will have upon his ruling.” (Italics added.) In State Board of Administration v. Pasco County (1945), 22 So. 2d 387, the Supreme Court of Florida said — The relation of the County Commissioners to the public * * * is not materially different from the relationship of attorney and client. * * * There should be no conflicts in their interests and if such arise, the…
• The Crummer Co. & R. E. Crammer & Co. v. du Pont, 223 F.2d 238 (5th Cir. 1955)
  …d Gall as taxpayer joined in, the Pasco County suit, which, the appellants to the contrary notwithstanding, was not at all times and in all places looked on as an outrage and an imposition. State Board of Administration v. Pasco County, 156 Fla. 37, 22 So. 2d 387. The complaint does not charge, or even suggest that the State Board of Administration, in bringing the suit, was a party to any unlawful combination or conspiracy, and no facts are alleged which show or indicate that Gall or Cummer Sons Cypress Co…