IN RE ESTATE OF CARLOS P. LAMAR, DECEASED. CONCEPCION LAMAR, CLAIMANT, AGAINST ESTATE OF DECEDENT, APPELLANT,

v.

ESTATE OF CARLOS P. LAMAR, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Beauford White v. State, 403 So. 2d 331 (Fla. 1981)
  …ert v. California, 388 U.S. 263, 87 S.Ct. 1951, 18 L.Ed.2d 1178 (1967); Stovall v. Denno, 388 U.S. 293, 87 S.Ct. 1967, 18 L.Ed.2d 1199 (1967). . Baxter v. State, 355 So. 2d 1234 (Fla.2d DCA), cert. denied, 365 So. 2d 709 (Fla.1978); Gibbs v. State, 344 So. 2d 621 (Fla.3d DCA 1977); Hamilton v. State, 303 So. 2d 656 (Fla.2d DCA 1974). . Subsequent to defendant’s trial, subsection (5)(i) has been added to the list of aggravating circumstances set forth in section 921.141, Florida Statutes (1979). Under this s…
• Eve Postell v. State, 383 So. 2d 1159 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980)
  …; T. B. v. State, 306 So. 2d 183 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975). The trial court found a knowing and intelligent waiver by Postell, and its finding is supported by substantial competent evidence. Lane v. State, 353 So. 2d 194 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); Gibbs v. State, 344 So. 2d 621 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); Melero v. State, 306 So. 2d 603 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975). We turn now to Postell’s challenge to her sentence. Postell claims that she fulfilled all requirements for sentencing under the Florida Youthful Offender Act, Sections 958.011…
• Ashley v. State, 370 So. 2d 1191 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)
  …3d DCA 1977). In this connection, it should be noted that the evidence presented at the trial overwhelmingly established the defendant’s guilt so that the admission of the confession, even though error, would have been harmless. Cf. Gibbs v. State, 344 So. 2d 621 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977). The seventh point presented urges error upon the exclusion at trial of a psychologist’s testimony, which was allowed in at the motion to suppress the confession hearing, but was not competent as to any issue before the jury. Evi…

Authorities Cited

• Goggin v. Shanley, 81 So. 2d 728 (Fla. 1955)
• In re Est. of Allen Lee Brugh v. Freas, 306 So. 2d 599 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975)
• In re Est. of Hugh Maxcy v. Marino, 178 So. 2d 43 (Fla. 2d DCA 1965)