THE STATE OF FLORIDA ON THE RELATION OF THE STATE WELFARE BOARD,
v.
J. M. LEE, AS COMPTROLLER OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Florida Supreme Court addressed whether the State Comptroller was obligated to transfer funds from the General Revenue Fund to supplement support for dependent children. The court held that the relevant statutes guaranteed only $500,000 for the dependent children's program, not an amount in excess thereof, and granted the Comptroller's motion to quash the alternative writ of mandamus.
The court held that the statutes read together guaranteed only $500,000 annually for dependent children's assistance, funded through a combination of motor vehicle maintenance taxes, wine taxes, and supplemental general revenue funds as necessary. The legislature did not intend to appropriate sums in excess of $500,000, and the Comptroller's motion to quash was therefore granted.
“Read together, they earmark the wine tax for the aid of dependent children with that guarantee from general revenue $500,000 to meet the appropriation made by Chapter 20957. In other words, it seems to have been the purpose of the Legislature to guarantee $500,000 for the support of dependent children and that whatever the wine tax and the motor vehicle maintenance tax imposed by Chapter 20210 lacked of producing this could be made up from the general revenue fund.”
Establishes the court's interpretation of the integrated statutory scheme and the legislature's intent to guarantee a fixed $500,000 amount for dependent children's assistance
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe State Welfare Board sought mandamus relief compelling the Comptroller to transfer $484,252.62 from the General Revenue Fund to supplement the depe…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Appropriations cases and more on FLexlaw
Alternative writ of mandamus was directed to the Comptroller commanding him to transfer to the credit of the State Welfare Board, fiscal year 1943-1944, the sum of $484,252.62 from the General Revenue Fund, or so much thereof as may be necessary to make up the difference between the funds credited to the dependent children’s program under Chapter 20957, Acts of 1941, Section 282.17, Florida Statutes 1941, and the sum of $500,000.00 from the net proceeds of Chapter 20210, Acts óf 1941, or to show cause why he refuses to do so.
A motion to quash challenges the sufficiency of the alternative writ and raises the further question of whether or not a sum in excess of $500,000.00 was contemplated for the dependent children’s program.
The applicable statutes are Chapter 20829, Acts of 1941, Section 561.62, Florida Statutes 1941, Chapter 20957, Acts of 1941, Section 282.17, Florida Statutes 1941 and Chapter 20210 as amended by Chapter 20919, Acts of 1941. Chapter 22026, Acts of 1943, also amended Chapter 20829, Acts of 1941 by enlarging the tax on wine and providing that it be paid into the General Revenue Fund to be used for the aid of dependent children as provided by law.
Chapter 280210 as amended by Chapter 20919, Acts of 1941, provides:
“All fees and taxes imposed by this Act and collected by the State Motor Vehicle Commissioner from the sale of Maintenance Tags shall be paid by him to the Treasurer of the State of Florida, who shall credit the total amount thereof to the fund for defendant children’s assistance; provided, however, that if in any year such proceeds exceed the sum of $500,000 tbe excess over such sum for such year shall be credited by the Treasurer to the State Road Department Fund.”
Chapter 20957, Acts of 1941 provides:
*723“In addition to all other appropriations, there is hereby appropriated to the fund for dependent children’s assistance out of any funds in the General Revenue Fund of the State of Florida, not otherwise appropriated, such sum as may be necessary each year to make up any difference existing in the particular year between the amount of $500,000 and the amount credited to such fund for dependent children’s assistance from the proceeds of the fees and taxes imposed by Chapter 20210, Laws of Florida, Acts of 1941, and collected by the State Motor Vehicle Commissioner from the sale of maintenance tags.”
These acts were passed at the same session of the Legislature and both looked to the support of the dependent children’s program. Read together, they earmark the wine tax for the aid of dependent children with that guarantee' from general revenue $500,000 to meet the appropriation made by Chapter 20957. In other words, it seems to have been the purpose of the Legislature to guarantee $500,000 for the support of dependent children and that whatever the wine tax and the motor vehicle maintenance tax imposed by Chapter 20210 lacked of producing this could be made up from the general revenue fund.
It appears to be the contention of relator that Chapter 20829 and Chapter 20957 make separate and distinct appropriations for the dependent children’s program but we fail to find this purpose exemplified. At best, we see a. guarantee of $500,000 for this work.
The motion to quash the alternative writ is therefore granted.
CHAPMAN, C. J., BUFORD and ADAMS, JJ., concur. .