AIRMART COIN LAUNDRIES, INC., APPELLANT,
v.
THE MAYTAG COMPANY, APPELLEE
AIRMART COIN LAUNDRIES, INC., APPELLANT,
THE MAYTAG COMPANY, APPELLEE
340 So. 2d 539
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1976)
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Fellows, 153 So. 2d 45 (Fla. 1st DCA 1963); Westinghouse Electric Corporation v. J. C. Penney Company, 166 So. 2d 211 (Fla. 1st DCA 1964); Florida Power & Light Company v. General Safety Equipment Company, 213 So. 2d 486 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1968). Compare Starkey v. Miami Aviation Corporation, 214 So. 2d 738 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1968).
Concurrence
NATHAN, J.,
concurring specially.
I concur in the result only, on the grounds that the third party complaint, as amended, did not allege any ultimate or specific facts detailing the alleged defects of the machines manufactured by Maytag. However, in all other respects I am of the opinion that Central Truck Lines, Inc. v. White Motor Corp., 316 So. 2d 579 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975), is controlling.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Fellows, 153 So. 2d 45 (Fla. 1st DCA 1963)
- Westinghouse Elec. Corp. v. J. C. Penney Co., Inc., 166 So. 2d 211 (Fla. 1st DCA 1964)
- Cent. Truck Lines, Inc. v. White Motor Corp., 316 So. 2d 579 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975)
- Fla. Power & Light Co. v. Gen. Safety Equip. Co., 213 So. 2d 486 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968)
- Starkey v. Miami Aviation Corp., 214 So. 2d 738 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968)