ANICIA MACHADO AND MANUEL MACHADO, HER HUSBAND, APPELLANTS,

v.

SALVADOR O'NEILL, M.D., APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• McALLISTER v. McALLISTER, 345 So. 2d 352 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977)
  …other respects, the final judgment is affirmed. ALDERMAN and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur. . It is not reflected in the record that he could not have finished his education but for her earnings. . Points 4 through 7 above include: DeCastro v. DeCastro, 334 So. 2d 834 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1976); Dorman v. Dorman, 332 So. 2d 358 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976); Hausman v. Hausman, 330 So. 2d 833 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1976); Norton v. Norton, 328 So. 2d 484 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976); Gall v. Gall, 336 So. 2d 10 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1976); Fugassi v. Fuga…
• Sokolsky v. Kuhn, 405 So. 2d 975 (Fla. 1981)
  …ot v. Busot, 354 So. 2d 1255 (Fla.2d DCA 1978); Clemons v. Morris, 350 So. 2d 519 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977); Hall v. Air Force Finance Center, Department of the Air Force of the United States, 344 So. 2d 1340 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977); and DeCastro v. DeCastro, 334 So. 2d 834 (Fla.3d DCA 1976), are inconsistent with this decision, they are disapproved. Accordingly, we hold that the exception to the head of the family exemption from garnishment of an ex-spouse’s wages created by section 61.12 does not apply here where th…
• Hall v. AIR Force Fin. Ctr., 344 So. 2d 1340 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977)
  …ed for nonpayment thereof.” Id. at 666. This opinion appears to be at odds with Reynolds v. Reynolds, supra, and Robinson v. Robinson, supra. It also would seem to have been modified sub silentio by the court’s later opinion in DeCastro v. DeCastro, 334 So. 2d 834 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1976). In DeCastro, after judgment of dissolution was entered, the trial court entered a money judgment against the former husband for unpaid temporary alimony. The husband contended on appeal that the trial court should not have allow…