CHASE & SHERMAN

v.

SUNBEAM CORP.

Citator

Cited By

• Ruth v. United States Fid. & Guar. Co., 83 So. 2d 769 (Fla. 1955)
  …quashed, but upon authority of Wolf v. Industrial Supply Corp., Fla., 62 So. 2d 30, it was doomed from inception, and the [*771] requested writ of certiorari was properly-denied without opinion. Biggs v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., Fla., 73 So. 2d 714. Proceedings to effectuate an appropriate appeal to test the correctness of the ruling complained of were available to the complaining parties. Compare Schwenck v. Jacobs, 160 Fla. 33, 33 So. 2d 592, with Sumerall v. Florida Tar & Creosote Corp., Fl…
• Sunbeam Corp. v. Masters OF Miami, Inc., 225 F.2d 191 (5th Cir. 1955)
  …onstitutional. Sunbeam Corporation v. Chase & Sherman, Inc., decided June 30, 1953. The Supreme Court of Florida, after hearing argument before the full Court en banc, denied certiorari without opinion. Chase & Sherman, Inc., v. Sunbeam Corporation, 73 So. 2d 714. The briefs of counsel, otherwise excellent and full, give us little help on the effect of that denial of certiorari by the Florida Supreme Court, and my brothers quite naturally assume that, like denial of certiorari by the United States Supreme Co…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Miami Parts & Spring, Inc. v. Champion Spark Plug Co., 364 F.2d 957 (5th Cir. 1966)
  …Court of Dade County, Florida, in passing on the application of Sunbeam for a temporary restraining order against Chase & Sherman, Inc., gave exhaustive consideration in a written opinion (Circ. Ct. Dade County, CCH Trade Cases 67,524, c. d., Fla., 73 So. 2d 714) to the constitutionality of the Florida fair trade law enacted in 1949 (Laws 1949, c. 25204) other than the nonsigner section, held it to be valid under the Florida constitution, and granted the temporary injunction sought. Chase & Sherman, Inc.,…