EMMANUEL STAMITOLES ET AL., APPELLANTS,
v.
BERNIE MAE OUTLAW AND JAMES E. OUTLAW, HUSBAND AND WIFE, APPELLEES
EMMANUEL STAMITOLES ET AL., APPELLANTS,
BERNIE MAE OUTLAW AND JAMES E. OUTLAW, HUSBAND AND WIFE, APPELLEES
333 So. 2d 87
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1976)
Caution
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Having considered the record, briefs, and oral arguments of counsel, and finding that the interlocutory appeal is without substantial merit, it is dismissed pursuant to Rule 4.2C, Florida Appellate Rules.
McCORD, Acting C. J., MILLS, J., and AGNER, JOHN ROYCE, Associate Judge, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Danette S. Quina and Gregory T. Quina v. Harrell, 338 So. 2d 238 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976)…decision in Parker v. Maule Industries, Inc., 321 So. 2d 106 (Fla.App.1st, 1975), cert, pending, we would not reverse for that error alone because appellants’ objection to the charge was not specific, as required by Young v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 333 So. 2d 87 (Fla.App.1st, 1976). Neither was the objection accompanied by a requested charge which appellants conceived would be appropriate, if the issue were to be submitted at all. But we find that there is no evidence in the record from which the jury could…
-
Rubel v. McCULLAGH, 512 So. 2d 1147 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987)…d with the evidence. The Rubels’ points on appeal primarily concern allegedly erroneous jury instructions. We do not reach the correctness of the instructions because the points raised on appeal were not preserved. Young v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 333 So. 2d 87 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976). Next, the Rubels urge that the trial court erred in ruling, during the Rubels’ attorney’s cross-examination of McCalls key witness, that the provisions of form 1145, required by section 482.226(1), Florida Statutes, and rule 10D…