WILLIAM CHAPMAN AND JOSEPH ALBERT, APPELLANTS
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. | 1954-05-21
ROBERTS, C. J., THOMAS, SEB-RING, HOBSON and DREW, JJ., and ROGERS, Associate Justice, concur., TERRELL, J., dissents.
72 So. 2d 826 Florida Supreme Court (1954) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The appellee, by and through the Attorney General of the State of Florida, has forthrightly confessed error in this case, and after an examination of the record, we agree.

The judgment is accordingly reversed and new trial granted.

ROBERTS, C. J., THOMAS, SEB-RING, HOBSON and DREW, JJ., and ROGERS, Associate Justice, concur. TERRELL, J., dissents.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Millican v. State, 84 So. 2d 712 (Fla. 1956)
    …ion at law was instituted against the District upon the obligations held by relator, resulting in a final judgment in favor of relator entered by the circuit court on February 6, 1953 [affirmed by this court, South Hastings Drainage Dist. v. Wright, 72 So. 2d 826]; that the District was in default in principal and interest on its outstanding bonds; and that it was the duty of the Board of Supervisors to include in the annual tax levy a tax for the purpose of paying such bonds and coupons. The alter [*713] na…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw