JUVENILE, K. G., APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1976-04-22
No. Z-192
RAWLS, Acting C. J., and McCORD and SMITH, JJ., concur.
330 So. 2d 519 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1976) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was charged with being a delinquent child. The first count of the petition charged her with breaking and entering with intent to commit a misdemeanor and the second count charged that she did willfully, maliciously and intentionally injure or damage the real or personal property of another. After presentation of the state’s evidence, the court below granted a judgment of acquittal as to the first count. At the conclusion of all of the evidence, the court below declared appellant guilty of vandalism even though at the same time he found her “vandalism” to be by accident- — that she accidentally broke a window. For a conviction under the second count, the damage must have been done willfully, maliciously and intentionally.

Reversed.

RAWLS, Acting C. J., and McCORD and SMITH, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • M.H. v. State, 936 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006)
    …en he accidentally accelerated forward, believing he was in reverse. Since Gonedes did not intend to commit the act (driving forward) which caused the damage, the element of malice was not proven. Gonedes, 574 So. 2d at 1199; see also K.G. v. State, 330 So. 2d 519 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976)(reversing conviction for vandalism based upon trial court’s finding that the window in question was broken accidentally). Likewise, the doctrine of transferred intent cannot sustain a conviction for criminal mischief. Thus, “[t]…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw