JERRY WITTENBERG, APPELLANT,
v.
GEORGE TILFORD AND ANN MARIE TILFORD, HIS WIFE, APPELLEES

Fla. 3d DCA | 1976-04-13
No. 75-2034
Before BARKDULL, C. J., and PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ.
330 So. 2d 216 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1976)

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

This interlocutory appeal is taken from an order denying appellant Jerry Witten- berg’s motion to dismiss and quash service of process. The plaintiff attempted to secure service upon this defendant pursuant to Fla.Stat. § 48.071. No other type of process was issued. The proof before the court demonstrates without issue that the defendant was not, at the time of the service of process, engaged in a business within this State. Therefore, the order appealed must be reversed and the cause remanded with directions to quash the attempt of service of process upon the appellant. Cf. Meiselman v. McKnight, Fla.App.1969, 226 So. 2d 437.

Reversed and remanded.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw