ARMOND B. HILLS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1975-10-08
No. W-457
324 So. 2d 723 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1975) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Floyd v. Wallace, 339 So. 2d 653 (Fla. 1976)
    …ered our order allowing certiorari and dispensing with oral argument pursuant to Rule 3.10e, F.A.R. Our jurisdiction vests under Article V, Section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution, because of conflict between the District Court’s decision, reported at 324 So. 2d 723, and Izlar v. Slyke, 94 Fla. 1218, 115 So. 516 (1928) and Hull v. Burr, 62 Fla. 499, 56 So. 673 (1911). On June 14, 1974, respondent Wallace filed suit to rescind and cancel a quitclaim deed and to have a diamond ring returned. Four days later, the…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw