TOMPKINS LAND CORPORATION AND FERNDALE GROVES COMPANY,
v.
A. E. WADE, ET AL.

Fla. | 1944-02-22
BUFORD, C. J., CHAPMAN and ADAMS, JJ., concur.
154 Fla. 112 Florida Supreme Court (1944)
Also reported at: 16 So. 2d 820

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

The Florida Supreme Court reversed a lower court's decision, finding that tax assessments on certain low-value, undrained lands were excessive and discriminatory. The court directed the lower court to reconsider the assessments and grant appropriate relief.


Holding

Yes, the tax assessments were excessive and discriminatory for some of the lands. The lower court erred in denying relief.


Key Quotes

“It appears from the record that the lands in question were in the main low and undrained from which the timber had been removed and that they were of little value except for pasture purposes.”

Establishes the factual basis for the appellants' claim of overvaluation.

Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Appellants challenged tax assessments on their lands, alleging they were in excess of true cash value and discriminatory compared to other properties …

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
TERRELL, J.:

TERRELL, J.:

This appeal is from a final decreee denying relief from tax assessments alleged to be in excess of true cash value and discriminatory as compared with the valuation of other properties in the county. The bill of complaint was seasonably filed and every other prerequisite was complied with.

It appears from the record that the lands in question were in the main low and undrained from which the timber had been removed and that they were of little value except for *113pasture purposes. It also appears that the law as defined in City of Fort Myers v. Heitman, 148 Fla. 432, 4 So. (2nd) 871; Coombes v. City of Coral Gables, 124 Fla. 374, 168 So. 524; Camp Phosphate Co. v. Allen, 77 Fla. 341, 81 So. 503, and like cases was not in all respects observed. In fine, we think the record makes a showing for relief as to some of the lands that was denied appellants both as to assessments and equalization.

The judgment is therefore reversed with directions to reconsider the assessments and grant appropriate relief.

Reversed.

BUFORD, C. J., CHAPMAN and ADAMS, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw