MILDRED JOHNSON, PETITIONER,
v.
EVANS OPTICAL & HEARING AID CENTER ET AL., RESPONDENTS; EVANS OPTICAL & HEARING AID CENTER AND ROBERT P. EVANS, CROSS-PETITIONERS, V. EMPLOYERS-COMMERCIAL UNION INSURANCE COMPANY AND THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION, CROSS-RESPONDENTS
MILDRED JOHNSON, PETITIONER,
EVANS OPTICAL & HEARING AID CENTER ET AL., RESPONDENTS; EVANS OPTICAL & HEARING AID CENTER AND ROBERT P. EVANS, CROSS-PETITIONERS, V. EMPLOYERS-COMMERCIAL UNION INSURANCE COMPANY AND THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION, CROSS-RESPONDENTS
321 So. 2d 557
Florida Supreme Court (1975)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
Certiorari denied.
ADKINS, C. J., and ROBERTS, BOYD, OVERTON, ENGLAND and HATCHETT, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Artemio Crespo v. State, 344 So. 2d 598 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977)…held. Thus, without his present address disclosed, the witness was sufficiently placed in his environment for the purpose of cross-examination, and as his environment might avail the jury in weighing his general credibility. See Hassberger v. State, 321 So. 2d 557 (Fla.4th DCA 1975); Smith v. Illinois, 390 U.S. 129, 88 S.Ct. 748, 19 L.Ed.2d 956 (1968). The non-disclosure of the present address of the witness Moore was of minimal effect in this case, and, in the circumstances presented, under the applicable au…
-
Quinlan Rental & Leasing, Inc. v. Linnel, 484 So. 2d 630 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986)…hem to provide for a pro-rata division of loss among the insurers. Motor Vehicle Casualty Co. v. Atlantic National Insurance Co., 374 F. 2d 601 (5th Cir.1967); see also, World Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. Stauffer, 306 So. 2d 131 (Fla. 2d DCA), cert. denied, 321 So. 2d 557 (Fla.1975). We, accordingly, reverse and remand with instructions to assign the first layer of coverage to Southeastern, up to $10,000 per person, and to provide for a pro-rata division of loss among the insurers for the second layer of coverage.…
-
The Travelers Ins. Co. v. Lexington Ins. Co., 478 So. 2d 363 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985)…d 1122. Similarly, where two competing policies contain escape clauses they are deemed repugnant and nugatory and coverage will be fully afforded under both policies. World Rent-a-Car, Inc. v. Stauf-fer, 306 So. 2d 131 (Fla.2d DCA 1974); cert, den., 321 So. 2d 557 (Fla.1975). Fla.Jur.2d Insurance, § 945. However, in those situations where an escape clause (no liability clause) competes with an excess clause in an opposing policy, the escape clause will be enforced. Continental Casualty Co. v. Weekes, 74 So. 2…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence